...
首页> 外文期刊>Sexually Transmitted Infections >Relative or absolute? A significant intervention for chlamydia screening with small absolute benefit
【24h】

Relative or absolute? A significant intervention for chlamydia screening with small absolute benefit

机译:相对还是绝对?衣原体筛查的重大干预措施,绝对获益很小

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

"This complex intervention within the English chlamydia screening programme led to a 76% increase in chlamydia screening test rates across all practices offered the intervention, with a 40% increase in infections detected."1 Thus begins the Discussion section of the article by McNulty, et al in this edition of Sexually Transmitted Infections. On the surface, the finding appears dramatic, offering hope for a major advance in the coverage of screening for chlamydial infection under the UK's National Chlamydia Screening Programme. Look a little deeper, however, and chlamydia screening clearly remains a major challenge.
机译:“英语衣原体筛查计划中的这一复杂干预措施导致在提供该干预措施的所有实践中,衣原体筛查测试率提高了76%,而检测到的感染率却增加了40%。” 1因此,McNulty在本文的“讨论”部分开始发言,等在此版本的性传播感染中。从表面上看,这项发现似乎很引人注目,为英国《国家衣原体筛查计划》在衣原体感染筛查方面的重大进展提供了希望。然而,看起来要更深一些,衣原体筛查显然仍然是一项重大挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号