首页> 外文期刊>Sexually Transmitted Infections >Validity of coital diaries in a feasibility study for the Microbicides Development Programme trial among women at high risk of HIV/AIDS in Mwanza, Tanzania.
【24h】

Validity of coital diaries in a feasibility study for the Microbicides Development Programme trial among women at high risk of HIV/AIDS in Mwanza, Tanzania.

机译:在坦桑尼亚姆万扎,对处于高感染艾滋病毒/艾滋病风险的妇女进行的杀菌剂发展计划试验的可行性研究中,性交日记的有效性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To compare coital diaries and face-to-face interviews (FFIs) in measuring sexual behaviour among women at high risk of HIV. To assess the effect of differing levels of support from researchers on reporting in coital diaries and FFIs. METHODS: Three groups of 50 women were randomly selected from a cohort of food and recreational facility workers participating in a microbicide trial feasibility study and received differing levels of researcher support. Minimum support involved delivering and collecting coital diaries weekly; medium support included a weekly FFI and discussion of concerns; intensive support also included an unscheduled mid-week visit when diaries were checked and concerns addressed. All respondents participated in an exit FFI, including questions on sexual behaviour over the four-week study period and study acceptability. RESULTS: Sexual behaviours were generally reported more frequently in coital diaries than weekly or exit interviews. Vaginal and anal sex, male and female condom use, vaginal cleaning and lubrication, sex during menstruation and sex with irregular and regular partners were reported more frequently in coital diaries than exit interviews. In coital diaries, level of support was associated with reporting of vaginal sex and cleaning. In exit interviews, support level was associated with reporting of vaginal sex, vaginal cleaning and sex with regular, irregular and commercial partners. Women with minimum support reported least satisfaction with the research process. Women with intensive support were most likely to report that they informed someone about their study participation and that they completed diaries daily. CONCLUSION: Compared with FFIs, coital diaries resulted in higher reporting of socially stigmatised activities, and sexual behaviour reporting varied less by level of support. More researcher support enhanced study acceptability.
机译:目的:比较性生活日记和面对面访谈(FFI),以衡量HIV高危女性的性行为。评估研究人员不同程度的支持对性日记和FFI报告的影响。方法:从一组参加杀微生物剂试验可行性研究的食品和娱乐设施工作人员中随机选择三组,每组50名妇女,并获得不同水平的研究人员支持。最少的支持涉及每周发送和收集性生活日记;中等支持包括每周FFI和关注问题的讨论;密集的支持还包括检查日记和解决疑虑的计划外的周中中期访问。所有受访者都参加了出口FFI,包括有关为期4周的研究期内的性行为和研究可接受性的问题。结果:在性生活日记中,性行为的报道通常比每周或离开面试的频率更高。与性交日记相比,在性交日记中报告的阴道和肛门性别,使用男性和女性安全套,阴道清洁和润滑,月经期间的性行为以及与不规则和有规律的伴侣发生性行为的频率要高于出访访谈。在性交日记中,支持水平与报告阴道性行为和清洁有关。在出站采访中,支持水平与报告阴道性行为,阴道清洁以及与定期,不定期和商业伙伴发生性行为有关。获得最少支持的妇女对研究过程的满意度最低。在强烈支持下的妇女最有可能报告说,他们向某人介绍了他们的研究参与情况,并且每天完成日记。结论:与外国直接投资人相比,性生活日记导致社会上带有污名化活动的报告增多,而性行为报告在支持水平上变化较小。更多的研究人员支持增强研究的可接受性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号