...
首页> 外文期刊>Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery >Randomized Trial Comparing Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy and Open Esophagectomy: Early Perioperative Outcomes Appear Improved With a Minimally Invasive Approach
【24h】

Randomized Trial Comparing Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy and Open Esophagectomy: Early Perioperative Outcomes Appear Improved With a Minimally Invasive Approach

机译:微创食管切除术和开放式食管切除术的随机对照试验:采用微创治疗方法改善了早期围手术期结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Esophagectomy is an important curative treatment modality for esophageal cancer, but is a complex operation with associated risks. A minimally invasive approach to esophagectomy may decrease the risks associated with resection. Recently, an important study was published in the Lancet by Biere and colleagues that reported the results of a randomized study, with the primary endpoint of postoperative pulmonary infection, comparing minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. The findings from this trial confirm the data from previous, non-randomized studies and highlight the substantial early postoperative benefits of minimally invasive esophagectomy.
机译:食管切除术是食道癌的一种重要的治疗方法,但操作复杂且具有相关风险。食管切除术的微创方法可降低与切除相关的风险。最近,Biere及其同事在《柳叶刀》杂志上发表了一项重要研究,报告了一项随机研究的结果,以术后肺部感染为主要终点,比较了微创食管切除术与开放式食管切除术治疗食管癌的情况。该试验的结果证实了先前非随机研究的数据,并强调了微创食管切除术对早期术后的巨大益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号