首页> 外文期刊>Cerebrovascular diseases >Is the endovascular treatment of carotid stenosis in high-risk patients really safer than carotid endarterectomy?
【24h】

Is the endovascular treatment of carotid stenosis in high-risk patients really safer than carotid endarterectomy?

机译:在高危患者中进行颈动脉狭窄的血管内治疗真的比颈动脉内膜切除术安全吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: We assess the outcomes of patients who would have been considered at high-risk from carotid endarterectomy (CEA), who have undergone endovascular treatment. METHODS: High-risk patients were classed as those with occlusion of the contralateral internal carotid artery, recurrent stenosis following CEA, stenosis secondary to neck irradiation or treatment prior to coronary bypass surgery. RESULTS: 103 procedures fulfilled at least one inclusion criterion. 58.3% had symptomatic disease. The all stroke/death rate was 9.7%. The major disabling stroke/stroke-related death rate was 3.9%. 63 had a contralateral occlusion, 15 post-CEA, 17 post-radiation and 33 pre-coronary surgery. The major disabling stroke/stroke-related death rates for each subset were 4.8, 6.7, 0 and 0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that this category of patients is at high-risk of stroke regardless of method of carotid intervention.
机译:背景:我们评估接受血管内治疗的颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)高危患者的结局。方法:高危患者分为对侧颈内动脉阻塞,CEA后复发性狭窄,颈部放疗后狭窄或冠状动脉搭桥手术前的治疗。结果:103个程序满足至少一个纳入标准。 58.3%有症状性疾病。全部中风/死亡率为9.7%。与残疾相关的主要中风/卒中死亡率为3.9%。 63例有对侧阻塞,CEA后15例,放疗后17例,冠状动脉手术前33例。每个子集的主要致残性卒中/卒中相关死亡率分别为4.8%,6.7%,0%和0%。结论:这些结果表明,无论采用何种颈动脉介入治疗方法,此类患者均处于中风的高危状态。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号