首页> 外文期刊>Central European Journal of Chemistry >Comparison of IFCC and NGSP methods for determination of glycated haemoglobin using advanced regression techniques
【24h】

Comparison of IFCC and NGSP methods for determination of glycated haemoglobin using advanced regression techniques

机译:使用高级回归技术比较IFCC和NGSP方法测定糖化血红蛋白的方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The objective of this work was a correct statistical comparison of two assay methods for determination of glycated haemoglobin HbA1c. The immunoturbidimetric determination of HbA1c was performed in two ways: using an automatic analyser Hitachi 912, calibrated according to the IFCC reference system (International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine) and using an analyser Advia 1200 and the NGSP reference system (National Glycohaemoglobin Standardization Program). For statistical comparison of these two analytical methods several advanced regression methods were used, which respect random errors of both compared methods. Specifically, Deming regression with and without weights, orthogonal regression, and Passing-Bablok regression were employed. The results demonstrate that the investigated analytical assay methods do not correspond to each other. The summarized results indicate usefulness of better harmonisation of two existing reference systems.
机译:这项工作的目的是对两种测定糖化血红蛋白HbA1c的测定方法进行正确的统计比较。 HbA1c的免疫比浊测定有两种方法:使用自动分析仪Hitachi 912(根据IFCC参考系统(国际临床化学和实验室医学联合会)进行校准)和分析仪Advia 1200和NGSP参考系统(国家糖化血红蛋白标准化)程序)。为了对这两种分析方法进行统计比较,使用了几种高级回归方法,这些方法都考虑了两种比较方法的随机误差。具体来说,使用带权重和不带权重的Deming回归,正交回归和Passing-Bablok回归。结果表明,所研究的分析测定方法彼此不对应。总结的结果表明更好地协调两个现有参考系统的有用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号