...
首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian journal of immunology. >Musings About Regulation by T-Suppressors: A Response to the Commentary by Kristofor Ellestad on 'Meanderings into the Regulation of Effector Class by the Immune System: Derivation of the Trauma Model'
【24h】

Musings About Regulation by T-Suppressors: A Response to the Commentary by Kristofor Ellestad on 'Meanderings into the Regulation of Effector Class by the Immune System: Derivation of the Trauma Model'

机译:关于T抑制物调节的思考:对Kristofor Ellestad的评论“免疫系统对效应子等级调节的影响:外伤模型的推导”的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Any discussion of the regulation of effector class must include feedback control on the magnitude of the response. The induced effector activities are biodestructive and ridding. They are, in and of themselves, unspecific with respect to self and nonself. Consequently all responses include some level of innocent bystander pathology. The regulation of magnitude is essential to keeping this level of pathology at an evolutionarily acceptable level. This is my postulated role of suppressor T-cells, more popularly referred to as Treg. In order to perform this function they must be somatically selected to be anti-nonself like all other T/B-cells. If correct, any role that they might play in determining normal tolerance is excluded. As the commentary of Ellestad illustrates, their function to regulate autoimmunity is the consensus view today and, therefore, this competing concept and my analysis of suggested papers should invite a wide ranging debate.
机译:关于效应子类别调节的任何讨论都必须包括对反应幅度的反馈控制。诱导的效应子活性是生物破坏性的和消除性的。他们就自身和非自身而言没有特定性。因此,所有回应都包括某种程度的无辜旁观者病理。大小调节对于使病理水平保持在进化上可接受的水平至关重要。这是我假定的抑制性T细胞(更普遍地称为Treg)的作用。为了执行此功能,必须像其他所有T / B单元一样,将它们选择为非自体。如果正确,则排除它们在确定正常耐受性中可能发挥的任何作用。正如埃莱斯塔德(Ellestad)的评论所表明的那样,它们调节自身免疫的功能已成为当今的共识,因此,这种相互竞争的概念以及我对所建议论文的分析应引起广泛的争论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号