首页> 外文期刊>SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants >A Comparison of Ammonia Emission Factors from Light-Duty Vehicles Operating on Gasoline, Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) and Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)
【24h】

A Comparison of Ammonia Emission Factors from Light-Duty Vehicles Operating on Gasoline, Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) and Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)

机译:汽油,液化石油气(LPG)和压缩天然气(CNG)上运行的轻型车辆氨排放因子的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Vehicular ammonia emissions are currently unregulated, even though ammonia is harmful for a variety of reasons, and the gas is classed as toxic. Ammonia emissions represent a serious threat to air quality, particularly in urban settings; an ammonia emissions limit may be introduced in future legislation. Production of ammonia within the cylinder has long been known to be very limited. However, having reached its light-off temperature, a three-way catalyst can produce substantial quantities of ammonia through various reaction pathways. Production of ammonia is symptomatic of overly reducing conditions within the three-way catalyst (TWC), and depends somewhat upon the particular precious metals used. Emission is markedly higher during periods where demand for engine power is higher, when the engine will be operating under open-loop conditions. The air-to-fuel ratio, cylinder temperature and rate of availability of carbon monoxide and nitrogen monoxide all correlate to varying degrees with ammonia production. In addition to a literature review, this study presents ammonia emissions data from three European passenger cars, using three different fuels, with varying physicochemical characteristics and carbon:hydrogen ratios, namely gasoline, LPG and CNG. All vehicles were tested on BOSMAL's chassis dynamometer over the New European Driving Cycle, with undiluted ammonia quantified directly at tailpipe. Both cycle mean emission factors and second-by-second data are presented. The results indicate a degree of correlation between ammonia emission and demand for engine power, for example upon commencing acceleration and following gear shifts. Emission over the entire driving cycle was found to vary depending on the fuel used, and between the three vehicles used in this study. One vehicle emitted 93% more ammonia when operating on gasoline than on CNG; the other vehicle emitted 2% more ammonia when running on LPG than on gasoline. A simple numerical correction implied that the lower carbon:hydrogen ratio was at least partially responsible for the minimal ammonia emissions observed when running on this fuel.
机译:尽管氨由于多种原因而有害,并且氨被归类为有毒气体,但目前车辆氨的排放不受管制。氨气排放对空气质量构成严重威胁,特别是在城市环境中;将来的立法中可能会引入氨气排放限制。长期以来,人们一直知道钢瓶内氨的产生非常有限。然而,三元催化剂达到其起燃温度后,可以通过各种反应途径产生大量的氨。氨的产生是三效催化剂(TWC)内还原条件过度的征兆,并且在某种程度上取决于所使用的特定贵金属。当发动机将在开环条件下运行时,对发动机功率的需求较高时,排放量会明显增加。空燃比,气缸温度以及一氧化碳和一氧化氮的利用率均与氨的产生有不同程度的关系。除文献综述外,本研究还提供了三种欧洲乘用车的氨气排放数据,这些乘用车使用了三种不同的燃料,其理化特性和碳:氢比各不相同,即汽油,LPG和CNG。在新欧洲行驶周期中,所有车辆均在BOSMAL底盘测功机上进行了测试,其中未稀释的氨直接在尾管处定量。同时给出了循环平均排放因子和秒数据。结果表明,例如在开始加速和跟随换档时,氨排放量与发动机动力需求之间的相关程度。研究发现,在整个驾驶循环中的排放随所使用的燃料以及在本研究中使用的三辆车之间而变化。一辆汽油车排放的氨水比CNG排放的多93%;在使用LPG时,另一辆车排放的氨比在汽油中多2%。一个简单的数字校正表明,较低的碳氢比至少部分负责使用这种燃料行驶时观察到的最小氨气排放。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号