首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian journal of caring sciences. >Psychometric properties of The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and The General Health Questionnaire-20 in COPD inpatients
【24h】

Psychometric properties of The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and The General Health Questionnaire-20 in COPD inpatients

机译:慢性阻塞性肺病住院患者的焦虑和抑郁量表及一般健康问卷-20的心理计量学特征

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Aim: To compare the psychometric properties between the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and General Health Questionnaire-version 20 (GHQ-20) in detecting psychological distress in COPD patients referred to pulmonary rehabilitation, and to examine the factor structure of GHQ-20. Methods: The study comprised 161 consecutive patients with mild to very severe COPD. For comparison of mean scores between the HADS and GHQ-20, one sample t-test was used. Potential differences in the detection of possible and normal cases were analysed using Pearson Chi square test. We report Pearson's correlations within and between the questionnaires, and internal consistency was assessed through Chronbach's alpha. The factor structure of the GHQ-20 was examined through principal axis factoring (PAF) with oblique rotation and eigenvalue >1. Results: There were no differences in mean scores of psychological distress between HADS and GHQ-20 (12.03 vs. 24.73, p=0.000), as well as no differences in the prevalence of possible cases of psychological distress (34.6 vs. 36.9, p=0.000) and normal cases (65.4 vs. 63.1, p=0.000). The observed difference between HADS and GHQ-20 regarding internal consistency was marginal, with Chronbach's alpha coefficients of 0.91 and 0.94, respectively. The PAF analysis resulted in a three-factor solution for GHQ-20, notably with only two items loading on the third factor, giving an internal consistency <0.70. A two-factor solution, comprising anxiety/depression and coping, may therefore be more appropriate. Conclusions: This study demonstrates no significant differences between the HADS and GHQ-20 in their ability to detect possible cases of psychological distress in a rehabilitation setting for COPD patients. Although the HADS and GHQ-20 are measuring different concepts of psychological distress, both questionnaires can be recommended as screening tools for detection of psychological distress in COPD inpatients. The GHQ-20 appears to be two-dimensional, comprising anxiety/depression as one dimension, and coping as the other dimension.
机译:目的:比较医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)与一般健康问卷第20版(GHQ-20)在检测COPD肺康复患者心理困扰中的心理计量学特性,并研究GHQ- 20方法:该研究包括161名连续的轻度至重度COPD患者。为了比较HADS和GHQ-20之间的平均得分,使用了一个样本t检验。使用Pearson卡方检验分析可能和正常病例中的潜在检测差异。我们报告了问卷内部和问卷之间的皮尔逊相关性,并通过Chronbach's alpha评估了内部一致性。 GHQ-20的因子结构通过倾斜旋转且特征值> 1的主轴因子分解(PAF)进行了检查。结果:HADS和GHQ-20之间的心理困扰平均得分没有差异(12.03 vs. 24.73,p = 0.000),并且可能出现心理困扰的情况也没有差异(34.6 vs. 36.9,p = 0.000)和正常情况(65.4与63.1,p = 0.000)。 HADS和GHQ-20在内部一致性方面的差异很小,Chronbach的alpha系数分别为0.91和0.94。 PAF分析得出了GHQ-20的三因素解决方案,特别是第三因素仅加载了两项,内部一致性<0.70。因此,包括焦虑/抑郁和应对的两因素解决方案可能更合适。结论:这项研究表明,HADS和GHQ-20在COPD患者康复环境中检测可能的心理困扰病例的能力上没有显着差异。尽管HADS和GHQ-20衡量的是不同的心理困扰概念,但可以建议使用两种调查表作为筛查工具来检测COPD住院患者的心理困扰。 GHQ-20似乎是二维的,其中焦虑/抑郁是一个维度,而应对是另一个维度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号