首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology. >A comparison of qualitative and quantitative fecal immunochemical tests in the Korean national colorectal cancer screening program
【24h】

A comparison of qualitative and quantitative fecal immunochemical tests in the Korean national colorectal cancer screening program

机译:韩国国家大肠癌筛查计划中粪便免疫化学定性和定量检测的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective. The National Cancer Screening Program (NCSP) has since 2004 provided annual colorectal cancer screening using the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) for individuals aged 50 years or older. The aim of this study was to examine the positivity and detection rates of the FIT and to compare the detection rates of the qualitative and quantitative FITs in participants in the 2009 NCSP. Methods. We analyzed positivity and detection rates according to FIT type (qualitative and quantitative). We used a multinomial logistic regression to analyze the odds ratio of "benign" or "suspicious cancer and cancer" compared to "normal," adjusted for gender, age, health insurance type, region of residence, hospital type, and FIT type. Results. Of the 1,181,904 participants, 72.8% received a qualitative and 27.2% a quantitative FIT. The positivity rates were 8.1% for the qualitative and 2.5% for the quantitative FIT. The detection rate was 5.2% for the qualitative and 14.4% for the quantitative FIT. The odds ratio of a "suspicious cancer and cancer" versus a "normal" result was 2.73 (95% CI = 2.22-3.35) for the quantitative compared to qualitative FIT, after adjustment. Conclusions. The positivity rate of the qualitative FIT was around three times higher than that of the quantitative FIT. However, the odds ratio for detection of "suspicious cancer and cancer" versus "normal" of the quantitative FIT was about three times higher than that of the qualitative FIT. These findings suggest that quality control may be important, particularly for the qualitative FIT.
机译:目的。自2004年以来,美国国家癌症筛查计划(NCSP)使用粪便免疫化学测试(FIT)为50岁以上的个人提供了年度大肠癌筛查。这项研究的目的是检验FIT的阳性率和检出率,并比较2009 NCSP参与者中定性和定量FIT的检出率。方法。我们根据FIT类型(定性和定量)分析了阳性率和检出率。我们使用多项逻辑回归分析来分析“良性”或“可疑癌症和癌症”与“正常”相比的比值比,并根据性别,年龄,健康保险类型,居住地区,医院类型和FIT类型进行调整。结果。在1,181,904名参与者中,有72.8%接受了定性FIT,而27.2%获得了定量FIT。定性的阳性率为8.1%,定量FIT的阳性率为2.5%。定性检出率为5.2%,定量FIT检出率为14.4%。调整后与定量FIT相比,“可疑癌症和癌症”结果与“正常”结果的比值比为2.73(95%CI = 2.22-3.35)。结论。定性FIT的阳性率约为定量FIT的三倍。但是,定量FIT的“可疑癌症和癌症”与“正常”检测的优势比约为定性FIT的三倍。这些发现表明,质量控制可能很重要,特别是对于定性FIT。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号