...
首页> 外文期刊>SAE International Journal of Alternative Powertrains >Optimizing and Diversifying the Electric Range of Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles for U.S. Drivers
【24h】

Optimizing and Diversifying the Electric Range of Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles for U.S. Drivers

机译:优化和多样化用于美国驾驶员的插电式混合动力汽车的电动范围

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

To provide useful information for automakers to design successful plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) products and for energy and environmental analysts to understand the social impact of PHEVs, this paper addresses the question of how many of the U.S. consumers, if buying a PHEV, would prefer what electric ranges. The Market-oriented Optimal Range for PHEV (MOR-PHEV) model is developed to optimize the PHEV electric range for each of 36,664 sampled individuals representing U.S. new vehicle drivers. The optimization objective is the minimization of the sum of costs on battery, gasoline, electricity and refueling hassle. Assuming no battery subsidy, the empirical results suggest that: 1) the optimal PHEV electric range approximates two thirds of one's typical daily driving distance in the near term, defined as $450/kWh battery delivered price and $4/gallon gasoline price. 2) PHEVs are not ready to directly compete with HEVs at today's situation, defined by the $600/kWh battery delivered price and the $3-$4/gallon gasoline price, but can do so in the near term. 3) PHEV 10s will be favored by the market over longer-range PHEVs in the near term, but longer-range PHEVs can dominate the PHEV market if gasoline prices reach as high as $5-$6 per gallon and/or battery delivered prices reach as low as $150-$300/kWh. 4) PHEVs can become much more attractive against HEVs in the near term if the electric range can be extended by only 10% with multiple charges per day, possible with improved charging infrastructure or adapted charging behavior. 5) the impact of a $100/kWh decrease in battery delivered prices on the competiveness of PHEVs against HEVs can be offset by about $1.25/gallon decrease in gasoline prices, or about 07/kWh increase in electricity prices. This also means that the impact of a $1/gallon decrease in gasoline prices can be offset by about 05/kWh decrease in electricity prices.
机译:为了为汽车制造商设计成功的插电式混合动力汽车(PHEV)产品提供有用的信息,并为能源和环境分析人员了解PHEV的社会影响提供有用的信息,本文讨论了如果购买PHEV,有多少美国消费者的问题。 ,宁愿选择什么电量程。开发了面向市场的PHEV最佳行驶里程(MOR-PHEV)模型,以针对代表美国新车驾驶员的36,664名抽样人员中的每个人优化PHEV电动行驶里程。最优化的目标是使电池,汽油,电力和加油麻烦的总成本最小化。假设没有电池补贴,则经验结果表明:1)最佳PHEV电动范围在短期内接近一个人的每日典型行驶距离的三分之二,分别为450美元/千瓦时的电池交付价格和4美元/加仑的汽油价格。 2)在目前的情况下,插电式混合动力汽车尚不能直接与混合动力汽车竞争,其定义为600美元/千瓦时的电池交付价格和3美元至4美元/加仑的汽油价格,但可以在短期内实现。 3)PHEV 10s在短期内将受到市场的青睐,而不是更长距离的PHEV,但是如果汽油价格高达每加仑5-6美元和/或电池交付的价格达到每加仑5-6美元,则长距离的PHEV可以主导PHEV市场。低至$ 150- $ 300 / kWh。 4)如果电动范围每天仅可扩大10%,且每天多次充电,则可能会改善混合动力电动汽车的吸引力,这可以通过改善充电基础设施或适应充电行为实现。 5)电池交付价格降低100美元/千瓦时对插电式混合动力汽车相对于混合动力汽车的竞争力的影响可以被汽油价格降低约1.25美元/加仑或电价提高约07 / kWh所抵消。这也意味着汽油价格每下降1美元/加仑的影响可以被电价下降大约05 / kWh所抵消。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号