首页> 外文期刊>Cell and tissue banking: An international journal of banking, engineering & transplantation of cells and tissues >A comparison of two microbial detection methods used in aseptic processing of musculoskeletal allograft tissues
【24h】

A comparison of two microbial detection methods used in aseptic processing of musculoskeletal allograft tissues

机译:无菌处理骨骼肌肉同种异体移植组织中两种微生物检测方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Tissues from 78 musculoskeletal donors were concurrently tested for microorganisms using both a swab and liquid culture method. An aggregate total of 20 organisms were detected by both methods. The swab detected 4/20 organisms while the liquid culture detected 18/20 organisms. The swab method yielded sensitivity and negative predictive values of 20 and 92.3%, respectively. Comparatively, the liquid culture displayed a sensitivity of 90% and a negative predictive value of 99%. These results clearly demonstrate that the liquid culture method is superior to swab cultures in microbial detection. Additional studies are necessary to determine the optimal culture conditions for different types of tissues when utilizing the liquid culture method.
机译:同时使用拭子和液体培养方法测试了来自78个肌肉骨骼供体的组织的微生物。两种方法总共检测到20种生物。拭子检测到4/20个生物,而液体培养物检测到18/20个生物。拭子法产生的敏感性和阴性预测值分别为20%和92.3%。相比之下,液体培养物的灵敏度为90%,阴性预测值为99%。这些结果清楚地表明,液体培养方法在微生物检测方面优于拭子培养。使用液体培养方法时,需要进行其他研究来确定不同类型组织的最佳培养条件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号