首页> 外文期刊>San Joaquin Agricultural Law Review >MASS MEAT CONSUMPTION, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND ANIMAL WELFARE: AN ALTERNATIVE APPEAL TO LIMITATIVE FEDERAL LEGISLATION
【24h】

MASS MEAT CONSUMPTION, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND ANIMAL WELFARE: AN ALTERNATIVE APPEAL TO LIMITATIVE FEDERAL LEGISLATION

机译:肉类消费,人权和动物福利:对联邦立法院的限制的替代上诉

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Alice Walker's quote reflects the heart of a sensitive issue behind humankind's presumptuous entitlement to unbridled access to animals for meat. Historically, arguments against the mass consumption of meat have typically focused on animal cruelty orhuman health risks. Lately, however, researchers have begun to acknowledge negative effects of large-scale meat production on human rights and the environment Unfortunately, these findings lack legal force for curbing meat production and importation, which consumption necessarily entails. Since Congress, along with the vast majority of state and local governments, has failed to limit mass meat production and importation—which involves what some might arguably define as animal torture on several levels— for the sake of animal welfare, perhaps this Comment's human-rights approach may better prompt federal legislative action.
机译:爱丽丝·沃克(Alice Walker)的名言反映了人类放纵地享有无限制地获取动物肉类的权利背后一个敏感问题的核心。从历史上看,反对大量食用肉类的争论通常集中在虐待动物或人类健康的风险上。然而,最近,研究人员开始认识到大规模肉类生产对人权和环境的负面影响。不幸的是,这些发现缺乏遏制肉类生产和进口的法律力量,而这必然导致消费。自国会与绝大多数州和地方政府一起以来,由于动物福利的原因,未能限制肉类的大规模生产和进口(涉及某些人可能将其定义为对动物的酷刑),这是为了动物福利,也许这条评论的人类权利方式可能会更好地促使联邦立法行动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号