首页> 外文期刊>Safety & Health >Targeting hazards, or naming and shaming?
【24h】

Targeting hazards, or naming and shaming?

机译:有针对性的危害,还是命名和羞辱?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OSHA'S RECENTLY PROPOSED revision to its Recordkeeping Standard would require nearly half a million establishments to submit their injury and illness data. This is information employers already are required to keep-OSHA would simply collect it. And then make it public.
机译:OSHA最近对其记录保存标准提出的修订将要求将近50万家企业提交其伤害和疾病数据。这是雇主已经必须保留的信息,OSHA会简单地收集它。然后将其公开。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号