...
首页> 外文期刊>Outlooks on Pest Management >CropLife America challenges Center for Biological Diversity and Pesticide Action Network lawsuit against EPA
【24h】

CropLife America challenges Center for Biological Diversity and Pesticide Action Network lawsuit against EPA

机译:CropLife America挑战生物多样性和农药行动网络中心针对EPA的诉讼

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

CropLife America (CLA) together with Responsible Industry for a Sound Environment (RISE), Mid America Crop-Life Association (MACA), Western Plant Health Association (WPHA), and Southern Crop Production Association(SCPA) filed a motion to intervene in Center for Biological Diversity and Pesticide Action Network North America v. Environmental Protection Agency. If CLA's role as an intervenor is granted, CLA will become a party to the lawsuit, according to a press release. CLA said that it stands behind protecting vulnerable species and their habitat, but this lawsuit is the wrong way to approach the problems within the ESA consultation process. The lawsuit was filed January 19 2011 and alleges the EPA has violated the ESA by failing to consult with the US Fish & Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service on the potential effects of over 380 active ingredients pesticides on 214 threatened and endangered species across 49 states. The broad scope of the lawsuit raises the possibility of potential product restrictions through a wide swath of US agriculture. It is imperative that CLA, RISE and their allies intervene to ensure modern agriculture has a voice in this lawsuit which could significantly reduce the availability of crop protection and pest control products across the country. Their goal is to guarantee that ESA consultations are rooted in sound science. (For more information: www.croplifeamerica.org).
机译:美国作物生命协会(CLA)与负责任的声音环境产业(RISE),中美洲作物生命协会(MACA),西方植物健康协会(WPHA)和南方作物生产协会(SCPA)提出了一项动议,要求对中心进行干预北美生物多样性和农药行动网络诉环境保护局。根据新闻稿,如果授予CLA干预角色,CLA将成为诉讼的当事方。 CLA表示,它支持保护脆弱物种及其栖息地,但此诉讼是在ESA磋商过程中解决问题的错误方法。该诉讼于2011年1月19日提起,指控美国环保署未能就美国380种有效成分农药对49个州的214种受威胁和濒危物种的潜在影响咨询美国鱼类和野生动物局和国家海洋渔业局,从而违反了ESA。 。诉讼的广泛范围通过广泛的美国农业增加了潜在产品限制的可能性。至关重要的是,CLA,RISE及其盟国必须介入以确保现代农业在这场诉讼中具有发言权,这可能会大大降低全国范围内作物保护和虫害控制产品的可用性。他们的目标是确保ESA磋商植根于可靠的科学。 (有关更多信息,请访问:www.croplifeamerica.org)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号