首页> 外文期刊>Cell and tissue banking: An international journal of banking, engineering & transplantation of cells and tissues >Flex center method versus center method for endothelial corneal evaluation in eye banking. A comparative analysis
【24h】

Flex center method versus center method for endothelial corneal evaluation in eye banking. A comparative analysis

机译:弹性中心法与中心法在眼库中评估内皮角膜的比较。比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Specular microscopy can provide a noninvasive morphological analysis of the cornea endothelial cell layer. A variety of analysis programs are available to determine corneal endothelial quality. The flex-center endothelial analysis method (Konan Inc) is a newer technique including the outermost digitized cells and thus increases the number of cells for analysis. The aim of this study is to analyze whether the new flex-center method, increases the possibilities of corneal endothelium evaluation before implants. For this purpose 67 corneas were studied by both methods at the Eye Bank of the Tissue Establishment of Córdoba. Although we have found differences in the resulting of number of cells in the area analysed, no significant differences were found with respect to the endothelial cell count, coefficient of variation cell area, and the percentage of hexagonal cells recorded. Based on this data, both methods can be used satisfactorily in eye banking.
机译:镜面显微镜可以提供角膜内皮细胞层的无创形态分析。可以使用多种分析程序来确定角膜内皮质量。弯曲中心内皮分析方法(Konan Inc)是一种较新的技术,包括最外面的数字化细胞,因此增加了用于分析的细胞数量。这项研究的目的是分析新的弯曲中心方法是否增加了植入前角膜内皮评估的可能性。为此,在科尔多瓦组织机构眼库中通过两种方法研究了67个角膜。尽管我们发现所分析区域中细胞数量的结果存在差异,但在内皮细胞计数,变异细胞面积系数和记录的六角形细胞百分比方面,没有发现显着差异。基于这些数据,两种方法都可以令人满意地用于眼库。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号