首页> 外文期刊>Osteoporosis international: a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA >The impact of two educational interventions on osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment after fragility fracture: a population-based randomized controlled trial.
【24h】

The impact of two educational interventions on osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment after fragility fracture: a population-based randomized controlled trial.

机译:两种教育干预措施对脆性骨折后骨质疏松症的诊断和治疗的影响:一项基于人群的随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This study assessed whether osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment after an osteoporotic fracture can be increased by providing osteoporosis reading material to patients and family doctors or by watching a videocassette about osteoporosis. Educating patients about osteoporosis had little impact on whether a woman received an osteoporosis diagnosis or treatment. INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of two education-based interventions on osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment in women >/= 50 years of age after fragility fracture. METHODS: Six to eight months after fracture, women were randomized into three groups: (1) control, (2) written materials, or (3) videocassette and written materials. Written materials for both the patient and physician detailed osteoporosis, fragility fracture, and available treatments; written materials for physicians were provided through patients. The educational videocassette presented similar information as the written material, but in greater depth. Rates of osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment following intervention were compared among groups using survival analysis methods. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.0167. RESULTS: At randomization, 1,174 women were without osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment, and after follow-up, 12% of the control group, 15% of the written materials group (p = 0.073), and 16% (p = 0.036) of the videocassette and written materials group were diagnosed with osteoporosis (statistical comparisons to control). Treatment rates were 8% for the control group, 12% for the written materials group (p = 0.052), and 11% for the videocassette and written materials group (p = 0.157). At randomization, 1,314 women were without treatment and after follow-up therapy was initiated in 10% of the control group, 13% of the written materials group (p = 0.107), and 13% of the videocassette and written materials group (p = 0.238). CONCLUSIONS: The educational interventions assessed in this trial were not satisfactory to increase osteoporosis diagnosis or treatment in recently fractured women to a clinically meaningful degree.
机译:这项研究评估了是否可以通过向患者和家庭医生提供骨质疏松症阅读材料或观看有关骨质疏松症的录像带来提高骨质疏松性骨折后的骨质疏松症的诊断和治疗。对患者进行有关骨质疏松症的教育对妇女是否接受骨质疏松症的诊断或治疗影响不大。引言:本研究的目的是调查脆性骨折后≥50岁女性的两种基于教育的干预措施对骨质疏松症诊断和治疗的影响。方法:骨折后六到八个月,将妇女随机分为三组:(1)对照,(2)书面材料或(3)盒式录像带和书面材料。为患者和医师编写的书面材料详细介绍了骨质疏松症,脆性骨折和可用的治疗方法;通过患者为医生提供了书面材料。教育性录像带展示了与书面材料类似的信息,但是内容更深。使用生存分析方法比较干预后骨质疏松症的诊断和治疗率。统计学显着性设置为p <0.0167。结果:在随机分组中,有1,174名妇女没有骨质疏松症的诊断和治疗,随访后,对照组的12%,书面材料组的15%(p = 0.073)和16%(p = 0.036)的妇女没有进行骨质疏松症的诊断和治疗。录像带和书面材料组被诊断出患有骨质疏松症(与对照组进行统计学比较)。对照组的治疗率为8%,书面材料组为12%(p = 0.052),录像带和书面材料组为11%(p = 0.157)。随机分组时,有1314名妇女未接受治疗,对照组中的10%,书面材料组的13%(p = 0.107),录像带和书面材料组的13%(p = 0.238)。结论:该试验评估的教育干预措施不能令人满意地将新近骨折妇女的骨质疏松症诊断或治疗提高到临床上有意义的程度。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号