首页> 外文期刊>Osteoarthritis and cartilage >Scientific production and impact of national registers: the example of orthopaedic national registers.
【24h】

Scientific production and impact of national registers: the example of orthopaedic national registers.

机译:科学生产和国家注册簿的影响:骨科国家注册簿的示例。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: National arthroplasty registers are often cited as examples of a non-randomized design that have made an essential contribution to advances in assessing arthroplasty procedures. We aimed to compare national registers to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses in the field of arthroplasty in terms of scientific production and impact. METHOD: We systematically searched Medline via PubMed and the registers' websites to select all articles from national registers, RCTs and meta-analyses assessing hip and knee arthroplasty. The scientific production and impact were evaluated by number of publications, number of citations (total and the 3-year citation counts), and information on the 2008 journal impact factor (IF), for each design and identified articles. We also contacted representatives of all the selected registers to determine the availability of the data for external research projects. RESULTS: We retrieved information on 13 active national hip or knee arthroplasty registers; for 9, data were available for research projects under specific conditions. Overall, 190 publications in peer-reviewed journals resulted from national arthroplasty registers, 476 from RCTs, and 40 from meta-analyses. We found 4,112 citations for national register reports, 7,328 for RCT reports and 552 for meta-analysis reports. The median [interquartile [IQR] range] number of citations for register, RCT and meta-analysis reports in the 3-year period after publication was 3.5 [1.0-6.0], 2.0 [1.0-6.0], and 2.5 [0.5-7.5], respectively. CONCLUSION: Publications from national registers may have the highest impact among the 3 designs in terms of median citation counts, but data from RCTs remain the most productive evidence in the arthroplasty field. Because of the number of patients recruited by registers, the quality of data collected, and the potential availability of data, scientific production and impact from national registers should be improved.
机译:目的:国家人工关节置换术经常被引用作为非随机设计的例子,这些设计对评估人工关节置换术的进展做出了重要贡献。我们的目的是将人工关节成形术领域的国家注册数据与随机对照试验(RCT)和荟萃分析进行比较,从科学的生产和影响方面来讲。方法:我们通过PubMed和注册者的网站系统地搜索了Medline,以从国家注册者,RCT和评估髋关节和膝关节置换术的荟萃分析中选择所有文章。对于每种设计和已识别的文章,通过出版物数量,被引次数(总被引次数和三年被引次数)以及有关2008年期刊影响因子(IF)的信息来评估科学生产和影响。我们还与所有选定注册机构的代表联系,以确定外部研究项目的数据可用性。结果:我们检索了有关13个活跃的全国性髋关节或膝关节置换术登记册的信息。有9种数据可用于特定条件下的研究项目。总体而言,在全国同行评审期刊上,有190篇出版物来自同行评审期刊,来自RCT的出版物为476篇,荟萃分析的为40篇。我们发现有4112篇被引用为国家注册报告,7,328篇为RCT报告以及552篇荟萃分析报告。发表后三年内,注册,RCT和荟萃分析报告的中位[四分位数[IQR]范围]引用数分别为3.5 [1.0-6.0],2.0 [1.0-6.0]和2.5 [0.5-7.5] ], 分别。结论:就中位引用数而言,国家注册簿中的出版物可能对3种设计产生最大的影响,但RCT的数据仍是人工关节置换领域最具生产力的证据。由于登记册招募的患者人数众多,收集的数据质量以及数据的潜在可用性,科学生产和国家登记册的影响都应得到改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号