...
首页> 外文期刊>Osteoarthritis and cartilage >Differences in trabecular bone texture between knees with and without radiographic osteoarthritis detected by directional fractal signature method.
【24h】

Differences in trabecular bone texture between knees with and without radiographic osteoarthritis detected by directional fractal signature method.

机译:通过定向分形签名方法检测到有和没有射线照相性骨关节炎的膝盖之间的小梁骨质地差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate differences in tibial trabecular bone (TB) texture between subjects with and without radiographic knee osteoarthritis (OA) using a variance orientation transform (VOT) method. DESIGN: Subjects with knee OA (Kellgren & Lawrence grade > or =2) and controls without OA (both n=26, seven women) were matched by sex, age, body mass index and compartment. The VOT method was applied to TB X-ray images and fractal signature and dimension in horizontal (FS(H), FD(H)) and vertical (FS(V), FD(V)) directions and along the roughest part of TB (FS(Sta), FD(Sta)), texture aspect ratio (Str) and signature (StrS), and mean FD (FD(MEAN)) were calculated. The VOT method was compared against an augmented Hurst orientation transform (HOT) method using paired t tests, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and coefficients of variation (CVs%). Longitudinal sensitivity to OA bone changes was not assessed. RESULTS: For the reproducibility of texture parameters, ICCs were >0.75 and CVs% were <8.2% for both methods. Compared with controls, FD(MEAN), FD(H), FD(V) and FD(Sta) for OA knees were lower (P<0.001), while Str was higher in both medial (P=0.03) and lateral (P=0.02) compartments. FS(H), FS(Sta) were lower for OA knees than for controls at sizes 0.3-0.7 mm (P<0.001) in both compartments. In lateral compartment, FS(V) for OA knees was lower than for controls at sizes 0.3-0.5 mm (P<0.001) and 0.55-0.70 mm (P<0.02), while in medial compartment at sizes 0.3-0.7 mm (P<0.001). Compared with controls, StrS for OA knees was higher at sizes 0.3, 0.55-0.70 mm in medial (P<0.03) and lateral (P<0.04) compartments. CONCLUSIONS: The VOT method is comparable to HOT method in the reproducibility of texture parameters and the ability to discriminate between non-OA and OA TB textures. However, unlike the HOT method, it quantifies texture roughness along the roughest part of the tibial bone, texture anisotropy at individual trabecular sizes and it works over a larger range of trabecular sizes. The VOT method may be a valuable tool for studying OA changes in TB.
机译:目的:使用方差取向变换(VOT)方法评估有无X线膝骨关节炎(OA)的受试者之间胫骨小梁骨(TB)质地的差异。设计:膝OA(Kellgren&Lawrence评分>或= 2)和无OA对照(n = 26,七名女性)的受试者按性别,年龄,体重指数和隔室进行匹配。 VOT方法应用于TB X射线图像以及水平(FS(H),FD(H))和垂直(FS(V),FD(V))方向以及沿TB最粗糙部分的分形特征和尺寸计算(FS(Sta),FD(Sta)),纹理纵横比(Str)和特征(StrS)以及平均FD(FD(MEAN))。使用配对t检验,类内相关系数(ICCs)和变异系数(CVs%),将VOT方法与增强型Hurst方向变换(HOT)方法进行了比较。未评估对OA骨变化的纵向敏感性。结果:对于纹理参数的可重复性,两种方法的ICC均> 0.75,CVs%<8.2%。与对照组相比,OA膝的FD(MEAN),FD(H),FD(V)和FD(Sta)较低(P <0.001),而内侧(P = 0.03)和外侧(P的)Str均较高= 0.02)个隔间。在两个腔室中,大小为0.3-0.7 mm(P <0.001)的OA膝的FS(H),FS(Sta)均低于对照。在0.3-0.5 mm(P <0.001)和0.55-0.70 mm(P <0.02)的情况下,外侧膝关节的FS(V)低于对照组,而在0.3-0.7 mm(P <0.001)。与对照组相比,内侧(P <0.03)和外侧(P <0.04)室的大小为0.3、0.55-0.70 mm的OA膝关节的StrS更高。结论:VOT方法在纹理参数的可重复性以及区分非OA和OA TB纹理的能力方面与HOT方法相当。但是,与HOT方法不同,它可以量化沿胫骨最粗糙部分的纹理粗糙度,单个小梁大小的纹理各向异性,并且可以在更大范围的小梁大小上工作。 VOT方法可能是研究TB的OA变化的有价值的工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号