首页> 外文期刊>Ophthalmologica: International Journal of Ophthalmology=Journal International d'Ophtalmologie >Prospective pilot study: Efficacy of Intravitreal Dexamethasone and Bevacizumab injections in the treatment of macular Oedema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion
【24h】

Prospective pilot study: Efficacy of Intravitreal Dexamethasone and Bevacizumab injections in the treatment of macular Oedema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion

机译:前瞻性先导研究:玻璃体内地塞米松和贝伐单抗注射液治疗黄斑水肿伴视网膜分支静脉阻塞的疗效

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background/Aims: To compare the efficacy of intravitreal injections of dexamethasone implants (IVD) with those of bevacizumab (IVB) for the treatment of macular oedema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion. Methods: A total of 19 patients (19 eyes) were included in this prospective pilot study. Initially, 8 eyes received three IVBs (group 1) and 11 received one IVD (group 2). All the patients underwent a 1-, 3-, 4- and 6-month follow-up visit. A repeated IVB (group 1) or IVD (group 2) was proposed at 4 months when necessary. Results: The mean visual acuity was significantly better 1 month after treatment in group 2, while the mean central macular thickness was also significantly lower in group 2. However, there was no longer any difference between the two groups at 3, 4 and 6 months, neither in terms of visual acuity nor in terms of retinal thickness. More than three IVBs were needed in 3 of 10 patients in group 1 while two IVDs were required in 10 of 11 patients in group 2. Conclusion: There was no significant difference between the two treatment regimens at the 6-month follow-up visit. A more rapid functional and anatomical efficacy was noted with IVD during the first month; however, reinjection at 4 months seemed more frequent with IVD than with IVB treatment.
机译:背景/目的:比较玻璃体内注射地塞米松植入物(IVD)和贝伐单抗(IVB)注射治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞性黄斑水肿的疗效。方法:该前瞻性初步研究共纳入19例患者(19眼)。最初,8只眼接受了3个IVB(组1),11只接受了1个IVD(组2)。所有患者均接受了1、3、4和6个月的随访。必要时建议在4个月时重复进行IVB(第1组)或IVD(第2组)。结果:第2组治疗后1个月的平均视力明显好转,而第2组的平均中央黄斑厚度也明显降低。但是,两组在第3、4和6个月不再有任何差异,无论从视敏度还是在视网膜厚度方面。第1组的10位患者中有3位需要超过3个IVB,而第2组的11位患者中有10位需要2个IVD。结论:在6个月的随访期间,两种治疗方案之间无显着差异。在头一个月中,IVD的功能和解剖功效更快。然而,IVD比IVB治疗更频繁地在4个月时再次注射。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号