首页> 外文期刊>Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging: the official journal of the International Society for Imaging in the Eye >Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by Galilei Dual-Scheimpflug Analyzer? and ultrasound pachymeter in myopic eyes
【24h】

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by Galilei Dual-Scheimpflug Analyzer? and ultrasound pachymeter in myopic eyes

机译:用Galilei Dual-Scheimpflug分析仪测量中央角膜厚度的比较?和超声测距仪在近视眼中

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

■ BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To compare the central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements by Galilei Dual-Scheimpflug analyzer (GSA) (Ziemer Group, Port, Switzerland) and ultrasound pachymeter (UP) in myopic eyes. ■ PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, CCT of 161 myopic eyes of 81 refractive surgery candidates (35 female, 46 male; mean age: 23.18 ± 4.08 years) were measured by GSA and UP consecutively. The data were analyzed statistically by paired t test, Bland-Altman plot, and Pearson correlation test to assess the agreement of the measurements. ■ RESULTS: The mean CCTs obtained by GSA and UP were 559.85 ± 30.87 and 560.41 ± 34.45 μm, respectively. No significant difference was found between the measurements (P = .684) and regression analysis showed a high correlation between the measurements obtained with both devices (r = 0.86; P < .001). A strong agreement between the two methods was also found by Bland-Altman plot. ■ CONCLUSION: In myopic eyes, the CCT measurements of GSA and UP are similar and highly correlated. Because of high agreement between these devices, the GSA is a non-contact method that may be an alternative to UP for measurement of CCT.
机译:■背景与目的:比较近视眼中伽利略双Scheimpflug分析仪(GSA)(Ziemer Group,Port,瑞士)和超声测厚仪(UP)对中心角膜厚度(CCT)的测量结果。 ■患者和方法:在这项前瞻性研究中,连续通过GSA和UP测量了81例屈光手术候选人(161例近视眼)的CCT(161例近视眼)(女性35例,男性46例;平均年龄:23​​.18±4.08岁)。通过配对t检验,Bland-Altman图和Pearson相关检验对数据进行统计学分析,以评估测量结果的一致性。结果:通过GSA和UP获得的平均CCT分别为559.85±30.87和560.41±34.45μm。在测量之间没有发现显着差异(P = .684),回归分析显示,两种设备获得的测量之间具有高度相关性(r = 0.86; P <.001)。通过Bland-Altman图也发现了两种方法之间的强烈一致性。结论:在近视眼中,GSA和UP的CCT测量值相似且高度相关。由于这些设备之间的高度一致性,GSA是一种非接触式方法,可以替代UP来进行CCT测量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号