...
首页> 外文期刊>Ophthalmologica: International Journal of Ophthalmology=Journal International d'Ophtalmologie >Clinical results after implantation of a spherical aberration-free intraocular lens: effect of contrast sensitivity and wavefront aberration--a clinical comparative study.
【24h】

Clinical results after implantation of a spherical aberration-free intraocular lens: effect of contrast sensitivity and wavefront aberration--a clinical comparative study.

机译:植入无球差的人工晶状体后的临床结果:对比敏感度和波前像差的效果-临床比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical results of the spherical aberration-free Akreos AO (Bausch & Lomb) with the Akreos Adapt (Bausch & Lomb), the parent model of spherical optic design. METHODS: Fifty patients (100 eyes) were randomly assigned to bilaterally receive Akreos AO or Akreos Adapt intraocular lenses (IOLs) after phacoemulsification. At 6 months postoperatively, best-corrected contrast sensitivities were determined at 3, 4.8, 7.5, 12 and 19 cycles per degree using a Visual Capacity Analyzer (L2 Informatique) under mesopic (5 cd/m(2)) and photopic (100 cd/m(2)) conditions with undilated pupils. Wavefront analysis of total aberration was performed with the WaveScan WaveFront System (Advanced Medical Optics VISX). RESULTS: Postoperative contrast sensitivities were not statistically different under mesopic and photopic conditions. On the other hand, fourth-order spherical aberration was lower in the AO group than the Adapt group with only a marginal difference (p = 0.048). Other higher-order aberrations such as coma and trefoil were not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.657, 0.614). The questionnaire on subjective visual quality in terms of glare disability, distant vision and night driving did not reveal an improved visual function in the AO group. CONCLUSION: The spherical aberration-free Akreos AO IOL did not show improved visual quality compared with its spherical counterpart.
机译:目的:为了比较无球差Akreos AO(Bausch&Lomb)和球面光学设计父模型Akreos Adapt(Bausch&Lomb)的临床结果。方法:白内障超声乳化术后,随机选择50例患者(100眼),分别接受双侧Akreos AO或Akreos Adapt人工晶状体(IOL)治疗。术后6个月,使用视觉容量分析仪(L2 Informatique)在中视(5 cd / m(2))和近视(100 cd)下,确定每度3、4.8、7.5、12和19个周期的最佳校正对比度敏感度/ m(2))瞳孔未扩张的情况。使用WaveScan WaveFront系统(Advanced Medical Optics VISX)对总像差进行波前分析。结果:在中视和明视条件下,术后对比敏感度无统计学差异。另一方面,AO组的四阶球差比Adapt组低,只有一个边际差异(p = 0.048)。两组之间的其他高阶像差(例如彗差和三叶形)没有显着差异(p = 0.657,0.614)。关于眩光残疾,远距离视力和夜间驾驶方面的主观视觉质量的问卷调查没有发现AO组的视觉功能得到改善。结论:与球面同类物相比,无球面像差的Akreos AO IOL没有显示出更好的视觉质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号