首页> 外文期刊>Oil and Gas Reporter >Surface Rights: Oklahoma Surface Damages Act
【24h】

Surface Rights: Oklahoma Surface Damages Act

机译:表面权利:《俄克拉何马州表面损害法》

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This case involves a surface damages appraisal action, commenced by Calyx, as operator, under the Oklahoma Surface Damages Act (the "Act") (52 O.S. §§ 381.2 to 381.9). The three appraisers return a report assessing $12,500 in surface damages. The landowners demand a jury trial, and the jury assesses damages to be in the amount of $23,500. Because the damages award on the jury verdict exceeds the appraisers' award of $12,500, the court finds that the landowners are entitled to reasonable attorney's fees. The landowners request that the trial court award treble damages based on their contention that the operator violated the Act by failing to post the damages bond required by section 318.4 of the Act. That claim is tried to the court, which rules that while Calyx failed to post a location damage bond as required by the Act, it had not done so "willfully and knowingly" because it in good faith confused the requirement for a "plugging bond" (which it did file) with the Act's own requirement for a damages bond.
机译:此案涉及由俄克拉荷马州操作者根据《俄克拉荷马州表面损害法》(“该法”)(美国法典52 O.S.§§381.2至381.9)发起的表面损害评估行动。三名评估师返回一份报告,评估表面损害为12,500美元。土地所有人要求进行陪审团审判,陪审团评估赔偿额为23,500美元。由于陪审团裁决的赔偿金额超过了鉴定人的赔偿金12,500美元,法院裁定土地所有人有权获得合理的律师费。土地所有者要求审判法庭根据其认为经营者未按《法案》第318.4条的要求提交损害赔偿保证书而违反《法案》的规定,裁定三倍赔偿。该诉求已提交法院审理,法院裁定,尽管Calyx未能按照该法案的要求张贴位置损害赔偿保证金,但它并未“故意和故意”这样做,因为它真诚地混淆了“堵塞保证金”的要求。 (它确实提起了诉讼),并附有该法案本身要求的赔偿保证金。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号