首页> 外文期刊>Oil and Gas Reporter >Court Jurisdiction, Procedure and Review: Certification of Question Joint Operating Agreements: Third-Party Beneficiary
【24h】

Court Jurisdiction, Procedure and Review: Certification of Question Joint Operating Agreements: Third-Party Beneficiary

机译:法院管辖权,程序和审查:问题证明联合经营协议:第三方受益人

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This case involves the certification of three questions from the Fifth Circuit that are based on the following factual scenario. In Re Moose Oil & Gas Co., 613 F.3d 521 (5th Cir. 2010). Moose Oil & Gas acquires several leases and assigns a portion of its working interest to a group of investors that includes Tawes. The owners of a tract of land adjacent to these leases, the Barnses, execute a lease that is eventually assigned to Dominion Oklahoma Texas Exploration and Production. Moose and Dominion execute several agreements, including a Working Interest Unit Agreement (WIUA) and a joint operating agreement (JOA).
机译:本案涉及第五巡回法院基于以下事实场景提出的三个问题的证明。 In Re Moose Oil&Gas Co.,613 F.3d 521(5th Cir.2010)。穆斯石油天然气公司(Moose Oil&Gas)获得了数笔租赁,并将其部分工作权益分配给包括Tawes在内的一组投资者。与这些租赁相邻的一块土地的所有者,即Barnses,执行了一项租赁,该租赁最终分配给了俄克拉荷马州德州勘探与生产公司(Dominion Oklahoma Texas)。 Moose和Dominion执行了几项协议,包括《工作利益单位协议》(WIUA)和一项联合运营协议(JOA)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号