...
首页> 外文期刊>Oncology: International Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment >Efficacy of Consolidation High-Dose Chemotherapy with Ifosfamide, Carboplatin and Etoposide (HD-ICE) Followed by Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Rescue in Chemosensitive Patients with Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcomas
【24h】

Efficacy of Consolidation High-Dose Chemotherapy with Ifosfamide, Carboplatin and Etoposide (HD-ICE) Followed by Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Rescue in Chemosensitive Patients with Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcomas

机译:异环磷酰胺,卡铂和依托泊苷(HD-ICE)联合大剂量化疗联合自体外周血干细胞抢救对转移性软组织肉瘤化学敏感患者的疗效

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: Prognosis of patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcomas (MSTS) is poor even after response to doxoru-bicin-based chemotherapy. We report phase II data of high-dose chemotherapy and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) rescue in patients with MSTS responding to Al-G chemotherapy. Patients and Methods: From 1997 to 2002, 55 patients with MSTS were prospectively treated with 4 cycles of Al-G (doxorubicin 75 mg/m2, ifosfamide 6 g/m2 with G-CSF support). Responders received 2 further cycles of Al-G with collection of PBSCs. High-dose chemotherapy consisted of ifosfamide 12 g/m2, carboplatin 1.2 g/m2 and etoposide 1.2 g/m2 (HD-ICE) followed by reinfusion of PBSCs. Results: Twenty-one of 55 patients (38%) were assessed as responders (3 complete response, 18 partial response). All but 2 pa- tients refusing treatment received high-dose chemotherapy with PBSC rescue leading to grade IV hematologic toxicity without severe infections in all patients. No toxic death occurred. After a median follow-up time of 30 months, the median progression-free time was 12 months and survival time was 22 months for the entire group. By intent-to-treat analysis the probability of 5-year progression-free survival was significantly higherfor patients allocated to HD-ICE compared to patients receiving second-line chemotherapy after failure of Al-G (14 vs. 3%; p = 0.003). The estimated 5-year overall survival between the 2 groups was different (27% vs. not reached) but did not reach significance (p = 0.08). Conclusion: HD-ICE is feasible and promising in patients with chemosensitive MSTS. A randomized phase III trial is warranted to further define the role of HD-ICE as consolidation treatment in these patients.
机译:背景:转移性软组织肉瘤(MSTS)患者的预后仍然很差,即使对基于阿霉素的比索化疗也有反应。我们报告了对Al-G化疗有反应的MSTS患者的大剂量化疗和外周血干细胞(PBSC)救援的II期数据。患者与方法:从1997年至2002年,对55例MSTS患者进行了4个周期的Al-G治疗(阿霉素75 mg / m2,异环磷酰胺6 g / m2,G-CSF支持)。响应者接受了PBSC收集的另外2个Al-G循环。大剂量化疗包括异环磷酰胺12 g / m2,卡铂1.2 g / m2和依托泊苷1.2 g / m2(HD-ICE),然后再输注PBSC。结果:55名患者中有21名(38%)被评估为有反应者(3例完全缓解,18例部分缓解)。除2名拒绝治疗的患者外,所有患者均接受了大剂量化疗,并进行了PBSC抢救,从而导致IV级血液学毒性,所有患者均无严重感染。没有中毒死亡。在中位随访30个月后,整个组的中位无进展时间为12个月,生存时间为22个月。通过意向性治疗分析,与Al-G失败后接受二线化疗的患者相比,分配给HD-ICE的患者5年无进展生存的可能性显着更高(14 vs. 3%; p = 0.003 )。两组之间估计的5年总生存率不同(27%vs.未达到),但未达到显着水平(p = 0.08)。结论:HD-ICE在化学敏感型MSTS患者中是可行的并且有希望。有必要进行一项随机的III期临床试验,以进一步确定HD-ICE在这些患者中作为巩固治疗的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号