首页> 外文期刊>Obstetrics and Gynecology: Journal of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists >Risks of second-trimester amniocentesis: why all the fuss 30 years later?
【24h】

Risks of second-trimester amniocentesis: why all the fuss 30 years later?

机译:孕中期羊膜腔穿刺术的风险:为什么在30年后大惊小怪?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Since the introduction of second-trimester amniocentesis in clinical practice during the 1970s, the procedure has always been characterized as being very safe but associated with a low risk of causing pregnancy loss. Early collaborative studies in North America examined the safety and accuracy of this procedure.1'2 These studies were conducted at a time when many obstetricians did not have vast experience with the procedure and only a portion of patients had an ultrasound examination before the procedure. Real-time ultrasound guidance was not available as we currently use it. The frequency of pregnancy loss after amniocentesis was compared with control populations who did not choose to have genetic testing or compared with general population data.
机译:自从1970年代在临床实践中引入孕中期羊膜穿刺术以来,该手术一直被认为是非常安全的方法,但导致流产的风险较低。北美的早期合作研究检查了该手术的安全性和准确性。1'2这些研究是在许多妇产科医生对手术没有丰富经验的情况下进行的,只有一部分患者在手术前进行了超声检查。目前我们无法使用实时超声引导。将羊膜腔穿刺术后流产的频率与未选择进行基因检测的对照人群进行比较,或与一般人群数据进行比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号