首页> 外文期刊>Obstetrics and Gynecology: Journal of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists >Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease
【24h】

Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease

机译:机器人和腹腔镜子宫切除术治疗良性妇科疾病的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The Rosero et al article has examined important inpatient data comparing outcomes in patients with benign disease undergoing robotic or laparo-scopic hysterectomy. It is important to note, however, that these data are from the national inpatient sample, and experience from high-volume centers has proven that many minimally invasive procedures performed robotically are performed through an outpatient approach. Patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery often are discharged either the same day or the next day. A recent 5-year comparison of quality metrics in patients with benign disease undergoing robotically assisted hysterectomy showed a decreased length of stay (LOS) and rate of readmissions before 30 days after surgery compared with nonrobotic cases. These findings differ from those of Rosero and those of Wright, whose recent article in JAMA reported no difference in quality outcomes. Differences between these studies most likely are related to volume, skills, and standardization of surgical pathways.
机译:Rosero等人的文章检查了重要的住院数据,比较了接受机器人或腹腔镜子宫切除术的良性疾病患者的预后。但是,必须注意的是,这些数据来自全国住院患者样本,并且来自大容量医疗中心的经验证明,许多通过机器人执行的微创手术都是通过门诊手术进行的。进行微创手术的患者通常在同一天或第二天出院。最近对进行机器人辅助子宫切除术的良性疾病患者进行的5年质量指标比较显示,与非机器人病例相比,术后30天的住院时间(LOS)和再入院率均有所降低。这些发现与Rosero和Wright的发现不同,后者在JAMA上的最新文章报道了质量结果没有差异。这些研究之间的差异很可能与手术途径的数量,技能和标准化有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号