【24h】

In reply

机译:回复

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

David Reardon has questioned our methods and conclusions. He chastises us for "belatedly noting" that some abortions may be misreported, calls our decision to adjust for history of miscarriage in some of our models "unwise" and "unexplained," suggests that the risks would be statistically significant if abor- tions were not concealed as miscarriages, and calls for us to publish a new analysis excluding women reporting miscarriages. Below, we address his concerns.
机译:David Reardon对我们的方法和结论提出了质疑。他对我们“迟迟未注意到”某些流产可能会被误报感到震惊,并称我们决定对某些模型中的流产史进行调整是“不明智的”和“无法解释的”,这表明如果堕胎是具有统计学意义的风险不被误认为是流产,并呼吁我们发表新的分析,不包括报告流产的妇女。下面,我们解决他的担忧。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号