首页> 外文期刊>Obstetrics and Gynecology: Journal of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists >Robotic compared with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: A randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Robotic compared with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: A randomized controlled trial

机译:机器人与腹腔镜sa腔结肠炎的比较:一项随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

To the Editor: In the January 2014 edition of Obstetrics & Gynecology, the debate about the role of robotics in benign gynecology continues, with two editorials, a randomized trial on laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy and one commentary. The randomized trial provides no new insights on the would-be superiority of robotic surgery on outcomes such as comorbidity or effectiveness. What is more, costs of robotic surgery were significantly higher and patient pain scores 1 week after surgery were higher in the robotics group. These findings are consistent with previous studies. As Dr. Advincula rightly mentions, cost analyses are difficult to perform. In our view, however, costs of ergonomic circumstances and physical challenges of (conventional) minimally invasive surgery must also be taken into account These include both direct costs for the health care provider and indirect costs (ie, from the hospital or societal perspective).
机译:致编辑:在2014年1月的《妇产科》中,关于机器人技术在良性妇科中的作用的争论仍在继续,有两篇社论,一项与腹腔镜手术相比,一项关于腹腔镜手术的随机试验和一项评论。随机试验没有提供关于机器人手术在合并症或有效性等结局方面可能具有优势的新见解。更重要的是,机器人组的机器人手术费用明显更高,术后1周的患者疼痛评分也更高。这些发现与以前的研究一致。正如Advincula博士正确提到的那样,成本分析很难执行。但是,我们认为,还必须考虑到人体工程学环境的成本和(常规)微创手术带来的身体挑战,这些成本既包括医疗服务提供者的直接成本,也包括间接成本(即从医院或社会角度)​​。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号