首页> 外文期刊>Rural Sociology >Powers and limits of transnational corporations: the case of ADM
【24h】

Powers and limits of transnational corporations: the case of ADM

机译:跨国公司的权力和局限:以ADM为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This analysis employs the case of lysine price fixing involving the food-processing transnational corporation (TNC) Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) and Asian-based firms. In an "economy and society" conceptual framework grounded in the sociology of agriculture and food, we investigate the powers and limits of TNCs in the global era. We argue that TNCs maintain significant powers which allow them to avoid the laws and regulations of nation-states. ADM was able to organize an illegal global cartel to control the world production and price of the feed supplement lysine. In addition, TNCs' actions in the global arena are limited by their inability to trust business partners and to organize and maintain systems of social control; these roles historically have been played by the nationstate. We conclude that despite their significant powers, TNCs' contradictory position in the global arena provides opportunities that can be used to democratize society.
机译:该分析采用了赖氨酸价格固定的案例,其中涉及食品加工跨国公司(TNC)阿彻丹尼尔斯米德兰(ADM)和亚洲的公司。在以农业和粮食社会学为基础的“经济与社会”概念框架中,我们研究了跨国公司在全球时代的力量和局限。我们认为,跨国公司拥有强大的权力,这使它们可以避免民族国家的法律和法规。 ADM能够组织一个非法的全球卡特尔来控制饲料补充赖氨酸的世界产量和价格。此外,跨国公司在全球舞台上的行动受到其无法信任业务伙伴以及组织和维持社会控制体系的限制。这些角色历来是由民族国家扮演的。我们得出的结论是,尽管跨国公司具有强大的实力,但它们在全球舞台上的矛盾地位提供了可用于使社会民主化的机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号