...
首页> 外文期刊>Rheumatology international. >Which of the three different tender points assessment methods is more useful for predicting the severity of fibromyalgia syndrome?
【24h】

Which of the three different tender points assessment methods is more useful for predicting the severity of fibromyalgia syndrome?

机译:三种不同的投标点评估方法中的哪一种对预测纤维肌痛综合征的严重程度更有用?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Digital palpation, myalgic scoring and dolorimetry are frequently used to count tender points in fibromyalgia syndrome. We aimed to investigate the probable relation between tender points count and fibromyalgia impact questionnaire and to assess which of the tender point counting methods is the most successful in predicting the severity of the disease. Tender point areas of 36 patients with fibromyalgia syndrome were assessed with three methods which are myalgic scoring, digital and dolorimetric tender points counting methods. Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire was used to measure the disease severity. The correlation between each of the assessment methods and fibromyalgia impact questionnaire was investigated. The mean count of digitally evaluated tender points was 14.86 +/- 2.67 and by dolorimetry was 11.81 +/- 4.48. The mean total myalgic score was found to be 24.61 +/- 8.91. All of the tender point evaluation methods correlated positively with each other (P < 0.01). Fibromyalgia impact questionnairescore was also correlated with only digital palpation tender point count of these three evaluation methods (r = 0.427, P < 0.05). Digital tender point count seemed to be sufficient for assessment, and there is no need for an additional instrument for tender point evaluation.
机译:数字触诊,肌力评分和肾功能检查常用于计数纤维肌痛综合征的压痛点。我们旨在调查招标点计数和纤维肌痛影响问卷之间的可能关系,并评估哪种招标点计数方法最能预测疾病的严重程度。对36例纤维肌痛综合征患者的嫩点面积进行了肌力评分,数字和白蛋白计数点数三种方法评估。使用纤维肌痛影响问卷调查疾病严重程度。研究了每种评估方法与纤维肌痛影响问卷之间的相关性。经数字评估的投标点的平均数为14.86 +/- 2.67,而通过比色法则为11.81 +/- 4.48。平均总的Myalgic得分被发现是24.61 +/- 8.91。所有投标点评估方法相互之间呈正相关(P <0.01)。纤维肌痛影响问卷评分也仅与这三种评估方法的数字触诊触痛点计数相关(r = 0.427,P <0.05)。数字投标点数似乎足以进行评估,并且不需要额外的仪器来进行投标点评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号