【24h】

Self-sufficiency, free trade and safety.

机译:自给自足,自由贸易和安全。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The relationship between free trade, self-sufficiency and safety of blood and blood components has been a perennial discussion topic in the blood service community. Traditionally, national self-sufficiency has been perceived as the ultimate goal that would also maximize safety. However, very few countries are, or can be, truly self-sufficient when self-sufficiency is understood correctly to encompass the whole value chain from the blood donor to the finished product. This is most striking when plasma derived medicines are considered. Free trade of blood products, or competition, as such can have a negative or positive effect on blood safety. Further, free trade of equipment and reagents and several plasma medicines is actually necessary to meet the domestic demand for blood and blood derivatives in most countries. Opposing free trade due to dogmatic reasons is not in the best interest of any country and will be especially harmful for the developing world. Competition between blood services in the USA has been present for decades. The more than threefold differences in blood product prices between European blood services indicate that competition is long overdue in Europe, too. This competition should be welcomed but carefully and proactively regulated to avoid putting safe and secure blood supply at risk.
机译:自由贸易,自给自足以及血液和血液成分安全之间的关系一直是血液服务界长期讨论的话题。传统上,国家自给自足被视为最终目标,也将最大限度地提高安全性。但是,如果正确地理解了自给自足以涵盖从献血者到成品的整个价值链,那么很少有国家能够或能够真正实现自给自足。当考虑血浆来源的药物时,这是最惊人的。血液制品的自由贸易或竞争本身可能对血液安全性产生负面或正面影响。此外,设备和试剂以及几种血浆药物的自由贸易实际上是满足大多数国家对血液和血液衍生物的国内需求所必需的。由于教条主义的理由而反对自由贸易并不符合任何国家的最大利益,对发展中国家尤其有害。美国血液服务之间的竞争已经存在了数十年。欧洲血液服务公司之间血液产品价格的三倍之多表明,欧洲的竞争也早该开始了。此竞赛应受到欢迎,但应谨慎主动地进行监管,以免将安全的血液供应置于危险之中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号