首页> 外文期刊>Respiration: International Review of Thoracic Diseases >Comparison of three cough-augmentation techniques in neuromuscular patients: mechanical insufflation combined with manually assisted cough, insufflation-exsufflation alone and insufflation-exsufflation combined with manually assisted cough.
【24h】

Comparison of three cough-augmentation techniques in neuromuscular patients: mechanical insufflation combined with manually assisted cough, insufflation-exsufflation alone and insufflation-exsufflation combined with manually assisted cough.

机译:三种神经肌肉患者咳嗽增强技术的比较:机械吹气结合人工辅助咳嗽,单独吹气-吹气和吹气-吹气结合人工辅助咳嗽。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Our results indicate that adding the MI-E device to MAC is unhelpful in patients whose PCF with an insufflation technique and MAC exceeds 5 liters/s. This is because the expiratory flow produced by the patient's effort and MAC transitorily exceeds the vacuum capacity of the MI-E device, which therefore becomes a transient load against the PCF.
机译:我们的结果表明,将MI-E设备添加到MAC对使用吹气技术且MAC超过5升/秒的患者无济于事。这是因为由患者的努力和MAC产生的呼气气流暂时超过了MI-E设备的真空容量,因此成为PCF的瞬时负载。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号