首页> 外文期刊>Resources policy >Which transparency matters? Compliance with anti-corruption efforts in extractive industries
【24h】

Which transparency matters? Compliance with anti-corruption efforts in extractive industries

机译:哪个透明度重要?遵守采掘业的反腐败工作

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) sets the standard in revenue transparency in 46 countries and works under the assumption that compliance with the initiative will improve transparency and curb corruption in member states. However, individual case studies raise doubts about the success of the initiative. Building upon the literatures on compliance and governance, this paper analyzes the impact of EM membership on transparency and corruption levels between 2006 and 2013. By using interrupted time series and panel data analyses, this research makes an original contribution to show that affiliation with the EM immediately improved overall aggregate data disclosure in member countries in this period. At the same time, the paper also shows that perceptions of corruption did not change. This outcome questions the effectiveness of promoting only a narrow definition of transparency in extractive industries as a measure to prevent corruption. The results imply that a more comprehensive treatment of transparency might be necessary; specifically to distinguish regimes that use transparency reforms for public relations purposes as opposed to genuine reformers. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:采掘业透明度倡议(EITI)为46个国家/地区的收入透明度设定了标准,并假设遵守该倡议将提高透明度并遏制成员国的腐败。但是,个别案例研究对该计划的成功提出了怀疑。本文基于合规与治理方面的文献,分析了新兴市场成员资格对2006年至2013年间透明度和腐败水平的影响。通过使用中断的时间序列和面板数据分析,本研究做出了原始贡献,表明了与新兴市场国家的隶属关系在此期间,成员国立即改善了总体总体数据披露。同时,该论文还表明,对腐败的看法没有改变。这一结果质疑在采掘业中仅推广狭义的透明度作为预防腐败的措施的有效性。结果表明可能需要对透明度进行更全面的处理;特别是要区分那些为公共关系目的而使用透明改革而不是真正的改革者的政权。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号