首页> 外文期刊>Resources, Conservation and Recycling >Biodegradable municipal waste (BMW) management strategy in Ireland: A comparison with some key issues in the BMW strategy being adopted in England
【24h】

Biodegradable municipal waste (BMW) management strategy in Ireland: A comparison with some key issues in the BMW strategy being adopted in England

机译:爱尔兰可生物降解的城市废物(BMW)管理策略:与英国采用的BMW策略中的一些关键问题进行比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Due to increasing pressure from the European Union to meet recycling and recovery targets, (e.g. the packaging waste, waste electronic equipment and landfill directives), both the Irish and England's governments' policy on waste management is changing to meet these pressures, with major emphasis upon the management of biodegradable municipal waste (BMW). In particular, the EU landfill directive requires reductions in the rate of biodegradable waste going to landfill to 35% by 2016. The objective of this paper is to examine how Ireland plans to meet this challenge and to compare. the Irish strategy to that being adopted in England. The approach in England is driven by a clear understanding that the practice in the late 1990s was unlikely to ensure compliance with EU targets by the set dates. England has therefore developed a discrete, programme (Waste Implementation Programme) to drive a new approach, based on rigorous science and international best practice, which includes a Demonstrator Programme for new technologies. The dynamic, high cost, large scale programme in England stands in sharp contrast to that for Ireland and only future., detailed analysis of outcomes will be able to evaluate the cost effectiveness of each. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:由于欧盟为达到回收利用和回收目标(例如包装废弃物,废弃电子设备和垃圾填埋指令)的压力越来越大,爱尔兰和英格兰政府的废物管理政策正在发生变化,以应对这些压力,重点是根据可生物降解的城市垃圾(BMW)的管理。尤其是,欧盟垃圾填埋指令要求到2016年将垃圾填埋场的可生物降解废物减少到35%。本文的目的是研究爱尔兰计划如何应对这一挑战并进行比较。爱尔兰在英国采用的策略。英格兰的这种做法是基于对1990年代后期的做法不太可能确保在规定日期之前遵守欧盟目标的明确了解。因此,英格兰在严格的科学和国际最佳实践的基础上,制定了一个独立的计划(废物实施计划)以推动采用一种新方法,其中包括针对新技术的示范计划。英格兰的动态,高成本,大规模计划与爱尔兰以及仅在未来的计划形成鲜明对比。对结果的详细分析将能够评估每个计划的成本效益。 (c)2006 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号