首页> 外文期刊>Resources, Conservation and Recycling >Systematic studies of shop and leisure voucher incentives for household recycling
【24h】

Systematic studies of shop and leisure voucher incentives for household recycling

机译:商店和休闲券激励家庭回收的系统研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This work reports on a series of medium scale trials of various voucher based incentives schemes for household recycling carried out in England. They show that increases of 10-20% in participation rates can be achieved with 3-month schemes. The results are drawn from 15 sub-projects carried out in 6 districts where parameters such as voucher value, types of shops used, demographics and community types were varied overall, allowing their effects to be explored. Surprisingly, the results show that the success does not depend on the affluence of the areas. Statistically strong data shows little difference across deprivation indices. Successful schemes were those where the vouchers were awarded on an individual household basis (very important), the value of each voucher was over 1 pound (epsilon 0.60), and the shops or facilities they are valid for were within half a mile (with suggestions from the public that if usable at supermarkets they would travel further). Although some improvements were seen in areas where participation rates were already over 65%, the schemes are more successful in areas which are not already achieving so highly, right down to those below 20%. Although schemes can be designed for maximum effect in small targeted areas, they could also be used on a large scale if e.g. supermarket vouchers were used. The study also reports on the costs of the schemes, which range from 5.15 pound per household to pound 12.10 per household over 3 months (including monitoring work). Possible savings of up to 50% are indicated. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:这项工作报告了在英格兰进行的各种基于凭证的家庭回收奖励计划的一系列中等规模试验。他们表明,使用3个月的计划可以使参与率提高10-20%。结果是从在6个地区执行的15个子项目中得出的,这些地区的凭证值,所用商店的类型,人口统计和社区类型等参数总体上有所不同,从而可以探讨其效果。令人惊讶的是,结果表明成功与否并不取决于这些地区的富裕程度。统计上有力的数据表明,贫困指数之间的差异很小。成功的计划是那些以单个家庭为基础发放凭单的计划(非常重要),每张凭单的价值超过1磅(epsilon 0.60),并且有效的商店或设施在半英里内(建议)公众表示,如果可以在超市使用,它们将继续行驶。尽管在参与率已经超过65%的地区看到了一些改善,但是该计划在尚未取得如此高的成就(甚至低于20%的成就)的领域更加成功。尽管可以将方案设计成在较小的目标区域发挥最大作用,但如果例如,它们也可以大规模使用。使用了超市凭证。该研究还报告了该计划的成本,在三个月内(每户)5.15英镑到每户12.10英镑(包括监控工作)。指出最多可能节省50%。 (C)2007 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号