首页> 外文期刊>Remote Sensing of Environment: An Interdisciplinary Journal >Quantifying burn severity in a heterogeneous landscape with a relative version of the delta Normalized Burn Ratio (dNBR)
【24h】

Quantifying burn severity in a heterogeneous landscape with a relative version of the delta Normalized Burn Ratio (dNBR)

机译:使用相对版本的归一化燃烧比(dNBR)量化异质景观中的燃烧严重性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Multi-temporal change detection is commonly used in the detection of changes to ecosystems. Differencing single band indices derived from multispectral pre- and post-fire images is one of the most frequently used change detection algorithms. In this paper we examine a commonly used index used in mapping fire effects due to wildland fire. Subtracting a post-fire from a pre-fire image derived index produces a measure of absolute change which then can be used to estimate total carbon release, biomass loss, smoke production, etc. Measuring absolute change however, may be inappropriate when assessing ecological impacts. In a pixel with a sparse tree canopy for example, differencing a vegetation index will measure a small change due stand-replacing fire. Similarly, differencing will produce a large change value in a pixel experiencing stand-replacing fire that had a dense pre-fire tree canopy. If all stand-replacing fire is defined as severe fire, then thresholding an absolute change image derived through image differencing to produce a categorical classification of burn severity can result in misclassification of low vegetated pixels. Misclassification of low vegetated pixels also happens when classifying severity in different vegetation types within the same fire perimeter with one set of thresholds. Comparisons of classifications derived from thresholds of dNBR and relative dNBR data for individual fires may result in similar classification accuracies. However, classifications of relative dNBR data can produce higher accuracies on average for the high burn severity category than dNBR classifications derived from a universal set of thresholds applied across multiple fires. This is important when mapping historic fires where precise field based severity data may not be available to aid in classification. Implementation of a relative index will also allow a more direct comparison of severity between fires across space and time which is important for landscape level analysis. In this paper we present a relative version of dNBR based upon field data from 14 fires in the Sierra Nevada mountain range of California, USA. The methods presented may have application to other types of disturbance events.
机译:多时间变化检测通常用于检测生态系统的变化。从多光谱发射前和发射后图像得出的单波段索引有所不同是最常用的变化检测算法之一。在本文中,我们研究了用于绘制野火引起的火灾影响的常用索引。从火灾前图像得出的指数中减去火灾后的值,可以得出绝对变化的量度,然后可以将其用于估算总碳释放量,生物量损失,烟雾产生等。但是,在评估生态影响时,测量绝对变化可能不适合。例如,在具有稀疏树冠的像素中,区分植被指数将测量到替换林分火后的微小变化。类似地,差异会在经历密集替换前树冠的替换林火的像素中产生较大的变化值。如果将所有替换林地的火灾都定义为严重火灾,则对通过图像差异得出的绝对变化图像进行阈值化以产生燃烧严重性的分类,可能会导致低植被像素的错误分类。当用一组阈值对同一火灾范围内不同植被类型的严重程度进行分类时,低植被像素的分类也会发生错误。从单个火灾的dNBR阈值和相对dNBR数据得出的分类比较可能会导致相似的分类精度。但是,相对于从多个火灾中使用的通用阈值集得出的dNBR分类,相对于高燃烧严重度类别的dNBR数据平均可以产生更高的准确度。这在绘制历史火灾时非常重要,因为在这些火灾中可能无法使用基于精确字段的严重性数据来进行分类。相对指数的实施还可以更直接地比较时空之间的火灾严重性,这对于景观水平分析很重要。在本文中,我们根据来自美国加利福尼亚内华达山脉的14次大火的现场数据,提出了dNBR的相对版本。提出的方法可能适用于其他类型的干扰事件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号