首页> 外文期刊>Remote Sensing of Environment: An Interdisciplinary Journal >Statewide land cover derived from multiseasonal Landsat TM data a retrospective of the WISCLAND project
【24h】

Statewide land cover derived from multiseasonal Landsat TM data a retrospective of the WISCLAND project

机译:来自多个季节Landsat TM数据的全州土地覆盖,是对WISCLAND项目的回顾

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) data were the basis in production a statewide land cover data set for Wisconsin, undertaken is partnership with U.S. Geological Survey's (USGS) Gap Analysis Program (GAP). The data set contained seven classes comparable to Anderson Level I and 24 classes comparable to Anderson Level II/III. Twelve scenes of dual-date TM data were processed with methods that included principal components analysis, stratification into spectrally consistent units, separate classification of upland, wetland, and urban areas, and a hybrid supervised/unsupervised classification called "guided clustering." The final data had overall accuracies of 94% for Anderson Level I upland classes, 77% for Level II/III upland classes, and 84% for Level II/III wetland classes. Classification accuracies for deciduous and coniferous forest were 95% and 93%, respectively, and forest species' overall accuracies ranged from 70% to 84%. Limited availability of acceptable imagery necessitated use of an early May date in a majority of scene pairs, perhaps contributing to lower accuracy for upland deciduous forest species. The mixed deciduous/coniferous forest class had the lowest accuracy, most likely due to distinctly classifying a purely mixed class. Mixed forest signatures containing oak were often confused with pure oak. Guided clustering was seen as an efficient classification method, especially at the tree species level, although its success relied in part on image dates, accurate ground truth, and some analyst intervention.
机译:与美国地质调查局(USGS)的差距分析计划(GAP)合作,Landsat Thematic Mapper(TM)数据是威斯康星州全州土地覆盖数据集生产的基础。数据集包含与安德森I级相当的七个类别和与安德森II / III级相当的24个类别。使用以下方法处理了十二个TM数据的十二个场景:主成分分析,分层成光谱一致的单位,高地,湿地和城市地区的单独分类,以及有监督/无监督的混合分类,即“引导聚类”。最终数据的总体准确度为:安德森(Anderson)一级旱地课程为94%,二/三级旱地课程为77%,二/三级湿地课程为84%。落叶林和针叶林的分类准确度分别为95%和93%,森林物种的整体准确度为70%至84%。由于可接受图像的可用性有限,因此必须在大多数场景对中使用5月初的日期,这可能会导致旱地落叶林物种的准确性降低。混合的落叶/针叶林类别的准确性最低,这很可能是由于对纯混合类别进行了明显分类。含有橡木的混合森林签名经常与纯橡木混淆。引导聚类被视为一种有效的分类方法,尤其是在树种级别,尽管其成功部分取决于图像日期,准确的地面真实情况和一些分析人员的干预。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号