首页> 外文期刊>Research in developmental disabilities >Comparison of intellectually disabled offenders with a combined history of sexual offenses and other offenses versus intellectually disabled offenders without a history of sexual offenses on dynamic client and environmental factors
【24h】

Comparison of intellectually disabled offenders with a combined history of sexual offenses and other offenses versus intellectually disabled offenders without a history of sexual offenses on dynamic client and environmental factors

机译:比较具有性犯罪和其他犯罪历史的智障罪犯与没有动态犯罪史的智障罪犯在动态客户和环境因素方面的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Sexually offensive behavior is prevalent among individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) and many sex offenders also commit other offenses such as vandalism or assault. We examined the differences between sex offenders with ID and a history of combined sex and other types of offenses (mixed sex offenders) versus offenders with no history of sexual offenses (non-sex offenders). Dynamic client and environmental factors were measured using the Adult Behaviour Checklist (ABCL) and the Risk Inventarization Scale on Sexually Offensive Behavior of Clients with intellectual disabilities (RISC-V). Item, subscale, and total scores were then compared for the two groups. Most of the comparisons did not reveal significant differences between the two groups. The findings call for a general theory of offending behavior to explain the absence of differences between the mixed sex offenders and non-sex offenders with ID.
机译:性攻击行为在智障人士中很普遍,许多性犯罪者还犯下了其他罪行,例如故意破坏或殴打。我们研究了具有身份证明,有合并性和其他类型犯罪记录的性犯罪者(混合性犯罪者)与没有性犯罪历史的犯罪者(非性犯罪者)之间的差异。使用成人行为清单(ABCL)和智力残疾客户的性侵犯行为风险清算量表(RISC-V)来测量动态的客户和环境因素。然后比较两组的项目,分量表和总分。大多数比较未显示两组之间的显着差异。研究结果要求使用犯罪行为的一般理论来解释具有ID的混合性罪犯和非性犯罪者之间没有区别。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号