...
首页> 外文期刊>Livestock Science >Validity and feasibility of qualitative behavior assessment for the evaluation of Nellore cattle temperament.
【24h】

Validity and feasibility of qualitative behavior assessment for the evaluation of Nellore cattle temperament.

机译:定性行为评估对内洛尔牛气质评估的有效性和可行性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The aims of this study were to assess the validity and the feasibility of the qualitative behavior assessment (QBA) method as indicator of Nellore cattle temperament under field conditions, evaluating its associations with four other traditional methods and weight gain. The temperament and live weight of 2229 Nellore cattle was assessed at approximately 550 days of age. Five measurements of cattle temperament were recorded: flight speed test (FS, in m/s), visual scores of movement in the crush (MOV), crush score (CS), temperament score (TS), and the qualitative behavior assessment method (QBA), by using a list of 12 behavioral based adjectives as descriptors of temperament. Average daily weight gain (ADG) was calculated for each animal. For statistical analysis of QBA data, the Principal Component Analysis was used. A temperament index (TI) was defined for each animal using the scores for the first principal component. Pearson's correlation coefficients were estimated between TI with FS and ADG. A mixed model ANOVA was used to analyze the TI variation as a function of TS, CS, and MOV. The score plot for the first and second principal components was used to classify the cattle in four groups (from very bad to very good temperament). The first principal component explained 49.50% of the variation in the data set, with higher positive loadings for the adjectives 'agitated' and 'active', and higher negative loadings for 'calm' and 'relaxed'. TI was significantly correlated with FS (r=0.49; P<0.01) and ADG (r=-0.10; P<0.01). The means of ADG, FS, and the temperament scores (CS, TS, MOV) differed significantly (P<0.01) among the four groups, from very bad to very good temperament. The QBA method could discriminate different behavioral profiles of Nellore cattle and were in agreement with other traditional methods used as indicators of cattle temperament. Additional studies are needed to assess the inter- and intra-observers reliability and to study its association with physiological parameters.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2013.08.004
机译:本研究的目的是评估定性行为评估(QBA)方法作为田间条件下内洛尔牛气质指标的有效性和可行性,评估其与其他四种传统方法和体重增加之间的关联。在大约550日龄时评估了2229头内罗尔牛的气质和活重。记录了五项牛气质测量值:飞行速度测试(FS,以m / s为单位),暗恋中运动的视觉得分(MOV),暗恋得分(CS),气质得分(TS)以及定性行为评估方法( (QBA),使用12种基于行为的形容词作为气质的描述词。计算每只动物的平均每日体重增加(ADG)。对于QBA数据的统计分析,使用了主成分分析。使用第一主要成分的分数为每只动物定义一个气质指数(TI)。皮尔逊相关系数在TI与FS和ADG之间进行估算。混合模型方差分析用于分析TI变化与TS,CS和MOV的关系。第一和第二主成分的评分图用于将牛分为四组(从非常差到非常好气质)。第一个主成分解释了数据集中49.50%的变化,形容词“激动”和“活跃”的正负载较高,而“平静”和“放松”的负负载较高。 TI与FS(r = 0.49; P <0.01)和ADG(r = -0.10; P <0.01)显着相关。在四组中,ADG,FS的平均值和气质得分(CS,TS,MOV)均存在显着差异(P <0.01),从非常差到非常好。 QBA方法可以区分内洛尔牛的不同行为特征,并且与其他传统方法相一致,可以用作牛气质指标。还需要进行其他研究来评估观察者之间和观察者之间的可靠性,并研究其与生理参数的关系。数字对象标识符http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2013.08.004

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号