首页> 外文期刊>Library hi tech >Leadership at the American Library Association and accessibility: a critical view
【24h】

Leadership at the American Library Association and accessibility: a critical view

机译:美国图书馆协会的领导力和无障碍获取:批判性观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to take a critical view at leadership of the American Library Association (ALA) and discuss the extent to which its policies promote, or fail to promote, a barrier-free online library environment. Design/methodology/approach - Analyses selected ALA policies, and examines the degree to which accessibility advocating groups within ALA participate in the process of policy making. Findings - Several ALA policies and guidelines dealing with digital resources neglect to address the needs of users with disabilities. The organizations within ALA that are advocates for people with disabilities, particularly the Libraries Serving Special Populations Section (LSSPS) and the Accessibility Assembly, fail to pay attention to policy development in other ALA branches. Practical implications - Suitable ALA organizations should establish a clearinghouse providing easy access to vendor-supplied information as well as pointers to data collected by independent researchers. Advocates for people with disabilities within ALA need to band together and put in place an organizational structure (a kind of watchdog group) that enables them to systematically monitor, and, if deemed necessary, to respond to the policies and guidelines drafted by other ALA groups. Originality/value - This is the only article that takes a critical view at ALA's leadership and discusses the extent to which ALA's policies promote, or fail to promote, a barrier-free online library environment.
机译:目的-本文的目的是对美国图书馆协会(ALA)的领导者持批判性看法,并讨论其政策促进或未能促进无障碍在线图书馆环境的程度。设计/方法/方法-分析选定的ALA政策,并检查ALA中的可访问性倡导组参与政策制定过程的程度。调查结果-有关数字资源的一些ALA政策和准则被忽略,无法满足残疾用户的需求。 ALA内倡导残疾人的组织,特别是为特殊人群服务的图书馆(LSSPS)和无障碍议会,没有重视ALA其他分支机构的政策制定。实际意义-合适的ALA组织应建立一个交换所,以方便地访问供应商提供的信息以及指向独立研究人员收集的数据的指针。 ALA中的残疾人倡导者需要团结起来并建立组织结构(一种看门狗组织),使他们能够系统地监视,并在必要时对其他ALA组起草的政策和指南做出回应。原创性/价值-这是唯一一篇对ALA领导层持批评态度并讨论ALA政策在多大程度上促进或未能促进无障碍在线图书馆环境的文章。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号