首页> 外文期刊>Lung. >Comparison of LMWH Versus UFH for Hemorrhage and Hospital Mortality in the Treatment of Acute Massive Pulmonary Thromboembolism After Thrombolytic Treatment Randomized Controlled Parallel Group Study
【24h】

Comparison of LMWH Versus UFH for Hemorrhage and Hospital Mortality in the Treatment of Acute Massive Pulmonary Thromboembolism After Thrombolytic Treatment Randomized Controlled Parallel Group Study

机译:溶栓治疗随机对照平行分组研究后,LMWH与UFH在出血和住院死亡率治疗急性大规模肺血栓栓塞中的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Current guidelines recommend the use of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for most haemodynamically stable patients with pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE), however, it is not clear whether LMWH is preferable to unfractionated heparin (UFH) for the treatment of massive PTE. We aimed to compare the use of LMWH versus UFH after thrombolytic treatment in the management of acute massive PTE for hemorrhage and hospital mortality.
机译:当前的指南建议对大多数血流动力学稳定的肺血栓栓塞症(PTE)的患者使用低分子量肝素(LMWH),但是尚不清楚LMWH是否优于普通肝素(UFH)治疗大规模PTE。我们的目的是比较溶栓治疗后LMWH和UFH在急性大面积PTE出血和住院死亡率管理中的应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号