...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiation Research: Official Organ of the Radiation Research Society >Measurement of tumor oxygenation: In vivo comparison of a luminescence fiber-optic sensor and a polarographic electrode in the P22 tumor
【24h】

Measurement of tumor oxygenation: In vivo comparison of a luminescence fiber-optic sensor and a polarographic electrode in the P22 tumor

机译:肿瘤氧合的测量:P22肿瘤中发光光纤传感器和极谱电极的体内比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Hypoxia is important in tumor biology and therapy. This study compared the novel luminescence fiber-optic OxyLite sensor with the Eppendorf polarographic electrode in measuring tumor oxygenation. Using the relatively well-oxygenated P22 tumor, oxygen measurements were made with both instruments in the same individual tumors. In 24 air-breathing animals, pooled electrode pO(2) readings lay in a range over twice that of sensor pO(2(5min)) values (-3.2 to 80 mmHg and -0.1 to 34.8 mmHg, respectively). However, there was no significant difference between the means +/- 2 SE of the median pO(2) values recorded by each instrument (11.0 +/- 3.3 and 8.1 +/- 1.9 mmHg, for the electrode and sensor respectively, P = 0.07), In a group of 12 animals treated with carbon monoxide inhalation to induce tumor hypoxia, there was a small but significant difference between the means +/- 2 SE of the median pO(2) values reported by the electrode and sensor (1.7 +/- 0.9 and 2.9 +/- 0.7 mmHg, respectively, P = 0.009), A variable degree of disparity was seen on comparison of pairs of median pO(2) values from individual tumors in both air-breathing and carbon monoxide-breathing animals. Despite the differences between the sets of readings made with each instrument from individual tumors, we have shown that the two instruments provide comparable assessments of tumor oxygenation in groups of tumors, over the range of median pO(2) values of 0.6 to 28.1. mmHg. (C) 2001 by Radiation Research Society. [References: 19]
机译:缺氧在肿瘤生物学和治疗中很重要。这项研究将新型发光光纤OxyLite传感器与Eppendorf极谱电极在测量肿瘤氧合作用方面进行了比较。使用氧饱和度较高的P22肿瘤,在相同的单个肿瘤中使用两种仪器进行氧测量。在24只呼吸动物中,汇集的电极pO(2)读数的范围是传感器pO(2(5min))值的两倍(分别为-3.2至80 mmHg和-0.1至34.8 mmHg)。但是,每种仪器记录的中位pO(2)值的平均值+/- 2 SE之间没有显着差异(分别为电极和传感器,分别为11.0 +/- 3.3和8.1 +/- 1.9 mmHg,P = 0.07),在接受一氧化碳吸入治疗以诱导肿瘤缺氧的12只动物的一组中,电极和传感器报告的中值pO(2)值的平均值+/- 2 SE之间存在微小但显着的差异(1.7分别为+/- 0.9和2.9 +/- 0.7 mmHg(P = 0.009),在呼吸和一氧化碳呼吸中,来自各个肿瘤的中位pO(2)对的比较发现差异程度的差异动物。尽管每种仪器从单个肿瘤获得的读数集之间存在差异,但我们已经表明,这两种仪器在pO(2)的中值范围为0.6至28.1的范围内,可对肿瘤组中的肿瘤氧合提供可比的评估。毫米汞柱(C)2001年,辐射研究学会。 [参考:19]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号