首页> 外文期刊>Nicotine & Tobacco Research >Media advocacy and newspaper coverage of tobacco issues: A comparative analysis of 1 year's print news in the United States and Australia
【24h】

Media advocacy and newspaper coverage of tobacco issues: A comparative analysis of 1 year's print news in the United States and Australia

机译:媒体宣传和报纸对烟草问题的报道:对美国和澳大利亚一年印刷新闻的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Tobacco control advocates now recognize the value of influencing news coverage of toacco; news coverage influences attitudes and behavior as well as policy progression. It is, however, difficult tob assess the progress of such efforts within a singlenational and temporal context. Our data represent the first systematic international comparison of press coverage of tobacco issues. Tobacco articles from major daily newspapers in Australia (12 newspapers; 1,188 articles) and the United States (30 newspapers; 1,317 articles) were collected over 1 year (2001). The analysis shows that coverage in the two countries was similarly apportioned between hard news (>70%) and opinion pieces. Similarly, stories in both countries were most likely to recount positive events. The substantive focus of coverage, however, differed, as did the expression of hostile opinion toward tobacco control efforts (United States, 4%; Australia, 7.1%). Although secondhand smoke and education, cessation, and prevention efforts werecovered widely in both settings, these topics dominated coverage in Australia (29.2%) more than in the United States (17.6%), where a more diffuse set of tobacco topics gained relative prominence. The difference in policy conditions seems to offer contrasting opportunities for advocates in the two countries to use newspapers to promote helpful tobacco control messages for both behavior and policy change.
机译:控烟倡导者现在意识到影响烟草新闻报道的价值。新闻报道会影响态度和行为以及政策进程。但是,很难在一个国家和一个时间范围内评估这种努力的进展。我们的数据代表了新闻界对烟草问题报道的首次国际系统比较。在一年(2001年)内,从澳大利亚(12家报纸; 1,188条)和美国(30家报纸; 1,317条)的主要日报中收集了烟草制品。分析表明,这两个国家的报道在硬新闻(> 70%)和舆论片之间的分配是类似的。同样,两个国家的故事最有可能叙述积极事件。但是,报道的实质性重点有所不同,对烟草控制努力的敌意表达也有所不同(美国,4%;澳大利亚,7.1%)。尽管在这两种情况下都广泛发现了二手烟以及教育,戒烟和预防工作,但这些主题在澳大利亚(29.2%)的报道中占主导地位,而美国(17.6%)则更为突出,而在美国,散布得多的烟草主题获得了相对突出的地位。政策条件的差异似乎为两国倡导者提供了形成对比的机会,使他们可以利用报纸宣传行为和政策变化的有益的烟草控制信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号