首页> 外文期刊>Nicotine & Tobacco Research >Medicinal nicotine nonuse: smokers' rationales for past behavior and intentions to try medicinal nicotine in a future quit attempt.
【24h】

Medicinal nicotine nonuse: smokers' rationales for past behavior and intentions to try medicinal nicotine in a future quit attempt.

机译:不使用药物尼古丁:吸烟者对过去行为的理由以及在将来戒烟尝试中尝试使用药物尼古丁的意图。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: Nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) is a proven smoking cessation treatment. Previous research has reported low rates of NRT use among quit attempters. This study analyzed population-level nonuse rates and reasons for not using NRT. Methods: Data were from the 2008 adult Colorado Tobacco Attitudes and Behaviors Survey (TABS), a population-based, random-digit-dialed telephone survey ( n=14,156). Primary measures were past NRT nonuse and future intentions regarding NRT use among current smokers intending to quit. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify reasons for past NRT nonuse associated with intention to use NRT in the future, adjusted for factors known to influence NRT use. Results: Nearly, 80% of 1,095 current smokers who intended to quit had never used NRT. The most common reasons for nonuse were belief that "willpower" alone is sufficient for cessation (21.5%), perceived lack of NRT effectiveness (15.6%), and cost (14.3%). Willpower was more widely reported among Hispanics than Anglos (36.9% vs. 14.7%) and nondaily versus daily smokers (30.4% vs. 12.5%). Most previous NRT nonusers reported they would use cold turkey (65.2%) in their next quit attempt; NRT was the next most common choice (15.0%). In multivariate analysis, smokers identifying cost or willpower as a reason for previous nonuse had significantly lower odds of planning to use NRT in a future quit attempt. Conclusions: The majority of smokers have never used NRT and do not plan to use it in the future. Cost and belief in willpower alone are significant barriers to using NRT in future smoking cessation attempt.
机译:简介:尼古丁替代疗法(NRT)是一种行之有效的戒烟疗法。先前的研究报道,戒烟尝试者中使用NRT的比率较低。这项研究分析了人口一级的不使用率以及不使用NRT的原因。方法:数据来自2008年成人科罗拉多州烟草态度与行为调查(TABS),这是一项基于人群的随机数字拨号电话调查(n = 14,156)。主要措施是过去不使用NRT,以及打算戒烟的当前吸烟者关于NRT使用的未来意图。使用多元逻辑回归来确定过去未使用NRT的原因与将来使用NRT的关联,并根据已知的影响NRT使用的因素进行了调整。结果:目前打算戒烟的1,095名吸烟者中,几乎有80%从未使用过NRT。不使用的最常见原因是相信仅凭“意志力”就足以戒烟(21.5%),缺乏NRT有效性(15.6%)和成本(14.3%)。在西班牙裔中,意志力的报告范围比盎格鲁人(36.9%比14.7%)和非每日吸烟者与每日吸烟者(30.4%比12.5%)更为广泛。大多数以前的NRT非用户都报告说,他们在下一次退出尝试中会使用火鸡(65.2%)。第二大选择是NRT(15.0%)。在多变量分析中,吸烟者将成本或意志力确定为以前不使用的原因,因此在未来的戒烟尝试中计划使用NRT的几率大大降低。结论:大多数吸烟者从未使用过NRT,也不打算在将来使用它。仅凭意志力的成本和信念就成为未来戒烟尝试中使用NRT的重大障碍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号