首页> 外文期刊>Lymphatic research and biology >Indurometer vs. Tonometer: Is the Indurometer Currently Able to Replace and Improve Upon the Tonometer?
【24h】

Indurometer vs. Tonometer: Is the Indurometer Currently Able to Replace and Improve Upon the Tonometer?

机译:硬度计与眼压计:硬度计当前是否能够替代和改进眼压计?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: The Indurometer is a tool designed by the Flinders Biomedical Engineering Department to replace the Tissue Tonometer. It measures the resistance to an applied force to quantify the amount of fibrosis present within the epifascial compartment of tissue. The aim of the study was to compare the current model of the Indurometer with the Tonometer to determine the level of variability and repeatability between the two devices and how the variability differs when compared to an individual's ISL stage. Methods and Results: Data were gathered on a total of 180 participants with unilateral arm lymphedema as part of an international multicenter trial. For each participant three repeat measurements were obtained with the Indurometer and Tonometer at the anterior mid forearm and anterior mid upper arm. The Indurometer gave lower measurement values than the Tonometer. The Tonometer was found to be less variable than the Indurometer when measurements were taken from the anterior mid upper arm and the anterior mid forearm site. The Tonometer values were significantly less variable than the Indurometer values in ISL stages 1 and 2. No significant variability was found in stage 3. Conclusion: The Indurometer is easier to use as compared to the Tonometer. Modification of the Indurometer needs to take place in order to improve its variability before it can be considered as a replacement for the Tonometer in the assessment of lymphedema. The lack of understanding of the ISL classification system is a significant issue.
机译:背景:Indurometer是由Flinders生物医学工程部设计的一种工具,用于代替组织眼压计。它可以测量对施加力的抵抗力,以量化存在于组织筋膜腔室内的纤维化量。这项研究的目的是比较Indurometer和Tonometer的当前模型,以确定两个设备之间的可变性和可重复性水平,以及与个人的ISL阶段相比可变性如何不同。方法和结果:作为一项国际多中心试验的一部分,收集了总共180名单侧手臂淋巴水肿参与者的数据。对于每个参与者,在前中臂前部和上中臂前部用Indurometer和Tonometer进行三次重复测量。硬度计给出的测量值低于眼压计。从前中上臂和前臂中部部位进行测量时,眼压计的可变性比Indurometer小。在ISL第1和第2阶段,眼压计的可变性明显小于Indurometer值。在第3阶段,未发现明显的可变性。结论:与Tonometer相比,Indurometer易于使用。为了改善其可变性,需要对Indurometer进行修改,然后才能将其视为评估淋巴水肿的Tonometer的替代品。对ISL分类系统缺乏了解是一个重要问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号