首页> 外文期刊>Libri: International journal of libraries and information services >Evidence-based Practice in Libraries-Principles and Discussions
【24h】

Evidence-based Practice in Libraries-Principles and Discussions

机译:图书馆的循证实践-原理与讨论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article examines problems concerning the introduction and future implementation of evidence-based practice (EBP) in libraries. First, some important conceptual distinctions and definitions are made concerning the scientific nature of EBP, the nature of the evidence movement and how the concept has been adopted and transformed when entering the library sector. It is shown that the approach of the library sector towards EBP in certain respects has been quite different from other societal sectors. Then the discussions about the more controversial aspects of EBP are reviewed, primarily based on experiences from Denmark. Here, it is shown that resistance towards EBP is based both on misunderstandings and on concern for values such as professional autonomy. Among the results, is an examination of how Danish library directors see the relationship between striving for innovation and creativity and EBP. The purpose of this article is both to qualify existing scepticism and reservation and-maybe-to clarify misunderstandings and objections through the presentation of arguments and data.
机译:本文研究了有关在图书馆中引入和实践循证实践(EBP)的问题。首先,对EBP的科学性质,证据移动的性质以及进入图书馆界后如何采用和转化该概念进行了一些重要的概念区分和定义。结果表明,图书馆部门在某些方面对EBP的处理方式与其他社会部门截然不同。然后,主要基于丹麦的经验,回顾了有关EBP更具争议性方面的讨论。在这里,表明对EBP的抵制既基于误解,也基于对诸如职业自治等价值观的关注。结果包括检查丹麦图书馆馆长如何看待创新和创造力与EBP之间的关系。本文的目的既是为了限制现有的怀疑和保留,也可能是通过提出争论和数据来澄清误解和反对意见。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号