首页> 外文期刊>Local environment >Radical, reformist, and garden-variety neoliberal: coming to terms with urban agriculture's contradictions
【24h】

Radical, reformist, and garden-variety neoliberal: coming to terms with urban agriculture's contradictions

机译:激进的,改良主义者的和花园式的新自由主义者:适应都市农业的矛盾

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For many activists and scholars, urban agriculture in the Global North has become synonymous with sustainable food systems, standing in opposition to the dominant industrial agri-food system. At the same time, critical social scientists increasingly argue that urban agriculture programmes, by filling the void left by the "rolling back" of the social safety net, underwrite neoliberalisation. I argue that such contradictions are central to urban agriculture. Drawing on existing literature and fieldwork in Oakland, CA, I explain how urban agriculture arises from a protective countermovement, while at the same time entrenching the neoliberal organisation of contemporary urban political economies through its entanglement with multiple processes of neoliberalisation. By focusing on one function or the other, however, rather than understanding such contradictions as internal and inherent, we risk undermining urban agriculture's transformative potential. Coming to terms with its internal contradictions can help activists, policy-makers and practitioners better position urban agriculture within coordinated efforts for structural change, one of many means to an end rather than an end unto itself.
机译:对于许多活动家和学者而言,全球北部的都市农业已成为可持续粮食系统的代名词,与占主导地位的工业化农业粮食系统相反。同时,批判性社会科学家越来越多地争辩说,都市农业计划通过填补社会安全网“回滚”所留下的空白,来支持新自由化。我认为这种矛盾是都市农业的中心。借助加利福尼亚州奥克兰市的现有文献和田野调查,我解释了城市农业是如何由保护性对抗而产生的,同时又通过其与新自由化的多个过程的纠缠来巩固当代城市政治经济的新自由主义组织。但是,通过专注于一种功能或另一种功能,而不是理解内部和固有的矛盾,我们就有可能破坏都市农业的变革潜力。与其内部矛盾相处,可以帮助激进主义者,政策制定者和从业者更好地将城市农业置于结构变革的协调努力中,这是达到目的而不是最终目的的多种手段之一。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号