首页> 外文期刊>Land Use Policy >Strange bedfellows or an aligning of values? Exploration of stakeholder values in an alliance of concerned citizens against coal seam gas mining
【24h】

Strange bedfellows or an aligning of values? Exploration of stakeholder values in an alliance of concerned citizens against coal seam gas mining

机译:奇怪的家伙或价值观的统一?探索有关公民反对煤层气开采的利益相关者价值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the inter-stakeholder relations in environmental and natural resource management disputes, farmers and environmentalists have traditionally fallen along opposing lines arguably due to seemingly incompatible values and fundamental differences between the groups. However, the expansion of the coal seam gas (CSG) industry has resulted in outrage and opposition from farming groups, environmentalists, and communities, leading to an alliance of these "strange bedfellows". This study explored the opposition movement to CSG in Australia with the use of techniques from social psychology to investigate whether shared values provided the common ground for the alliance. An online survey of values was conducted (N = 197) with members of the CSG opposition alliance. No evidence was found to support the hypothesis that this alliance of stakeholders is comprised of two distinct sub-groups; farmers and environmentalists. The personal values of the respondents were highly inter-compatible, and aligned with social altruism. Sub-clusters were identified which corresponded with the extent to which respondents considered the CSG industry to impact on their lives. This research challenges the appropriateness of predetermined stakeholder classifications being applied to environmental and natural resource management issues, and highlights values as a relevant social factor in the cooperation potential of oft-conflicting stakeholder groups. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在环境和自然资源管理纠纷的利益相关方之间的关系中,农民和环境保护主义者传统上可以说是走在对立的立场上,这是由于看似不相容的价值观和群体之间的根本差异。然而,煤层气(CSG)行业的扩张导致了农业团体,环保主义者和社区的愤怒和反对,导致了这些“奇怪的床友”的联盟。这项研究使用社会心理学的技术探索了澳大利亚对CSG的反对运动,以研究共同价值观是否为联盟提供了共同基础。与CSG反对派联盟的成员进行了价值在线调查(N = 197)。没有证据支持这一利益相关者联盟由两个不同的子群体组成的假说。农民和环保主义者。受访者的个人价值观高度兼容,并且与社会利他主义保持一致。确定了子类别,这与受访者认为CSG行业对其生活产生影响的程度相对应。这项研究挑战了将预先确定的利益相关者分类应用于环境和自然资源管理问题的适当性,并强调了作为经常冲突的利益相关者群体合作潜力的相关社会因素的价值。 (C)2014 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号