首页> 外文期刊>Landscape Ecology >Testing methods to produce landscape-scale presettlement vegetation mapsfrom the US public land survey records
【24h】

Testing methods to produce landscape-scale presettlement vegetation mapsfrom the US public land survey records

机译:从美国公共土地调查记录中生成景观尺度预置植被图的测试方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The U.S. Public Land Survey (PLS) notebooks are one of the best records of the pre-European settlement landscape and are widely used to recreate presettlement vegetation maps. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relative ability of several interpolation techniques to map this vegetation, as sampled by the PLS surveyors, at the landscape level. Field data from Sylvania Wilderness Area, MI (U.S.A.), sampled at the same scale as the PLS data, were used for this test. Sylvania is comprised of a forested landscape similar to that present during presettlement times. Data were analyzed using two Arc/Info interpolation processes and indicator kriging. The resulting maps were compared to a 'correct' map of Sylvania, which was classified from aerial photographs. We found that while the interpolation methods used accurately estimated the relative forest composition of the landscape and the order of dominance of different vegetation types, they were unable to accurately estimate the actual area occupied by each vegetation type. Nor were any of the methods we tested able to recreate the landscape patterns found in the natural landscape. The most likely cause for these inabilities is the scale at which the field data (and hence the PLS data) were recorded. Therefore, these interpolation methods should not be used with the PLS data to recreate pre-European settlement vegetation at small scales (e.g., less than several townships or areas < 10(4) ha). Recommendations are given for ways to increase the accuracy of these vegetation maps.
机译:美国公共土地测量(PLS)笔记本是欧洲前定居景观的最佳记录之一,被广泛用于重建预设的植被图。这项研究的目的是评估几种插值技术在景观水平上绘制这种植被的相对能力,如由PLS测量员采样的。此测试使用了来自美国密西根州西尔瓦尼亚荒野地区的野外数据,该数据的采样比例与PLS数据相同。西尔瓦尼亚由森林景观组成,类似于预设时间。使用两个Arc / Info插值过程和指标克里金法对数据进行了分析。将得到的地图与Sylvania的“正确”地图进行比较,后者是根据航空照片分类的。我们发现,尽管使用插值方法可以准确估算景观的相对森林组成和不同植被类型的优势程度,但它们无法准确估算每种植被类型所占的实际面积。我们测试的任何方法也都无法重现自然景观中的景观图案。这些无能的最可能原因是记录现场数据(以及因此的PLS数据)的规模。因此,不应将这些插值方法与PLS数据一起用于以小规模(例如少于几个乡镇或面积小于10(4)公顷)重建欧洲前定居植被。提出了提高这些植被图准确性的方法的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号