...
首页> 外文期刊>Land Use Policy >Is 'Better cotton' better than conventional cotton in terms of input use efficiency and financial performance?
【24h】

Is 'Better cotton' better than conventional cotton in terms of input use efficiency and financial performance?

机译:就投入使用效率和财务绩效而言,“更好的棉花”是否比传统棉花更好?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Based on mainly primary data collected from 302 farmers in Punjab province of Pakistan, this study analyzed inputs use efficiency of and financial return from "better cotton" and conventional cotton. It also sought reasons for cultivation and non-cultivation of "better cotton" based on farmers' socioeconomic characteristics and their direct responses to related questions. The findings of analyses revealed "better cotton" better than conventional cotton in terms of both inputs use efficiency and financial return. Despite being less efficient in terms of inputs use efficiency and financial return, farmers were growing conventional cotton primarily because the government agency responsible for agricultural extension had not paid attention to promotion of "better cotton" as in the BCI project area. Important policy conclusions are drawn and broad recommendations are made for the promotion of "better cotton" in Punjab and elsewhere. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:该研究主要基于从巴基斯坦旁遮普省的302位农民收集的主要数据,分析了“优质棉花”和常规棉花的投入使用效率和财务回报。它还根据农民的社会经济特征及其对相关问题的直接回应,寻求种植和不种植“优质棉花”的原因。分析的结果表明,在投入使用效率和财务回报方面,“更好的棉花”要优于常规棉花。尽管在投入使用效率和财务收益方面效率较低,但农民种植常规棉花的主要原因是,负责农业推广的政府机构并未像BCI项目地区那样重视推广“更好的棉花”。得出了重要的政策结论,并为在旁遮普邦和其他地方推广“更好的棉花”提出了广泛的建议。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号